论逃逸致人死亡中“人”之范围

On the Scope of the “Person”in the Death Caused by Escape

我国刑法并未明确交通肇事罪中"逃逸致人死亡"中"人"的范围,因而给司法认定带来了不少困惑和争议。对于因行为人的逃逸造成先前肇事行为中被撞伤者未获及时救助而最终死亡的人,其属于"逃逸致人死亡"中的"人",对此已基本无争议。学界主要围绕二次肇事中的被害人是否属逃逸致人死亡中的"人"产生了较大争议。从语义逻辑、立法意旨、罪刑均衡等角度,应当认为"逃逸致人死亡"中的"人"仅指第一次肇事事故中的被害人,而不含二次肇事中的被害人。

The criminal law of China does not definite the scope of the ＂person＂in the death caused by escape,which brings some puzzle and controversy associated with judicatory identity.There is almost not any controversy on the issue that the person who dies from the previous traffic accident without the perpetrator＇s timely rescues.The behavior belongs to the person whose escape results in the death of victim in question.There is a great debate in the academia concerning whether the victim in the second accident should be refined as the person in question.From the perspectives of semantic logic of clause,legislative intention and balance between crime and punishment,the ＂person＂whose death results from the escape should be restricted as the victim in the first traffic accident,and the victim in the second accident should not be included.