期刊文献+

Information Systems Development in a Low Methodology Maturity Environment: A Case Study from the Control Perspective

Information Systems Development in a Low Methodology Maturity Environment: A Case Study from the Control Perspective
原文传递
导出
摘要 This paper presents an exploratory case study to examine information systems development (ISD) processes in a low methodology maturity environment, and to understand the role of control mechanisms in project success. The case involves the development of a large scale information system, which progressed without a fully-defined "master plan" or much reliance on formal methodologies, but was successfully launched nevertheless despite some delay. Data were analyzed from the lens of control theory. Results show that clan control emerged as a dominant form of informal control in a high complexity and low methodology maturity environment. Moreover, end-to-end user participation through collocation with the developers served as effective outcome control, which appeared to be a critical success factor. The reliance on behavior control was marginal, although the project manager's effective leadership as a form of self-control also played a role in project success. This work contributes to ISD research in general and the development of a control perspective to user participation in ISD. This paper presents an exploratory case study to examine information systems development (ISD) processes in a low methodology maturity environment, and to understand the role of control mechanisms in project success. The case involves the development of a large scale information system, which progressed without a fully-defined "master plan" or much reliance on formal methodologies, but was successfully launched nevertheless despite some delay. Data were analyzed from the lens of control theory. Results show that clan control emerged as a dominant form of informal control in a high complexity and low methodology maturity environment. Moreover, end-to-end user participation through collocation with the developers served as effective outcome control, which appeared to be a critical success factor. The reliance on behavior control was marginal, although the project manager's effective leadership as a form of self-control also played a role in project success. This work contributes to ISD research in general and the development of a control perspective to user participation in ISD.
机构地区 School of Business
出处 《Frontiers of Business Research in China》 2013年第3期382-401,共20页 中国高等学校学术文摘·工商管理研究(英文版)
关键词 information systems development control modes control mechanisms information systems development, control modes, control mechanisms,
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Alder, P. S., McGarry, F. E., Irion-Talbot, W. B., discipline: Lessons from the journey to CMM 215-227. & Binney, D. J. 2005. Enabling process level 5. MIS Quarterly Executive, 4(1):.
  • 2Barkley, B. T., & Saylor, J. H. 2001. Customer-driven project management." Building quality into project processes (2nd edition). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Professional.
  • 3Ciborra, C. 2002. The labyrinths of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 4Dobing, B., & Parsons, J. 2006. How UML is used. Communications of the ACM, 49(5): 109-113.
  • 5Ehrhart, M. G., & Klein, K. J. 2001. Predicting followers' preferences for charismatic leadership: The influence of follower values and personality. Leadership Quarterly, 12: 153-179.
  • 6Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532-550.
  • 7Gopal, A., & Gosain, S. 2010. Research note -The role of organizational controls and boundary spanning in software development outsourcing: Implications for project performance. Information Systems Research, 21(4): 960-982.
  • 8Gowan, J. A., Jr, & Mathieu, R. G. 2005. IS project management: Project characteristics and management practices. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(1/2): 235-255.
  • 9Hansen, L. K., & Kraemmergaard, P. 2012.1Tprojectportfolio management: Controlproblems in a public organization. Proceedings of the Transforming Government Workshop 2012. Bnmel University, London, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom May 8th-9th.
  • 10Harter, D. E., Krishnan, M. S., & Slaughter, S. A. 2000. Effects of process maturity on quality, cost and cycle time in software product development. Management Science, 46(4): 451-466.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部