期刊文献+

外显感恩、相对内隐感恩和整体内隐感恩 被引量:7

Explicit Gratitude,Relative Implicit Gratitude and Global Implicit Gratitude
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过感恩量表、内隐联想测验(IAT)和单类内隐联想测验(SC-IAT)三种方法测量感恩,并比较三者的关系。方法:外显感恩采用何安明等人编制的青少年感恩量表(AGS),内隐感恩采用inquisit 3编制两个实验程序:自我-他人IAT(实验1)和自我SC-IAT(实验2)。结果:(1)被试整体外显感恩水平比较高,自我-他人IAT和自我SC-IAT实验的内隐效应显著,并且都显示在内隐层面被试对自己有较高的评价,外显感恩和内隐感恩均不存在性别差异;(2)外显测量与内隐测量相关不显著,自我-他人IAT与自我SC-IAT之间相关也不显著。结论:自我-他人IAT测量的是相对内隐感恩,而自我SC-IAT测量的是整体内隐感恩,是两个相对独立的建构。 Objective:To measure gratitude through three methods, Gratitude Scale, Implicit Association Test and Single Category Implicit Association Test, and compare their relationships. Methods:Explicit gratitude was tested by Adolescent Gratitude Scale, implicit experi- ment procedures were made by inquisit 3 : Test 1 was self - others IAT, Test 2 was self SC - IAT. Results : ( 1 ) Global explicit gratitude was high, implicit effects were significant in self - others IAT and self SC - IAT, which meant they had high self - evaluation in both ex- plicit and implicit levels, Gender difference did not exit; (2) There was no significant correlation between explicit gratitude and implicit gratitude, there was also no significant correlation between self - others IAT and self SC - IAT. Conclusion : Self - others IAT measures relative implicit gratitude, which self SC - IAT measures global implicit gratitude, they were two independent constructions.
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 2013年第4期368-373,共6页 Psychological Exploration
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(12CSH021) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(11YJCZH049) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(12YJCZH080) 2013年度河南省高校科技创新人才(人文社科类)支持计划 信阳师范学院高层次人才科研启动基金项目 2012年地方高校国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(201210477026)
关键词 外显感恩 相对内隐感恩 整体内隐感恩 内隐联想测验(IAT) 单类内隐联想测验(SC-IAT) explicit gratitude relative implicit gratitude global implicit gratitude Implicit Association Test (IAT) Single Category Im- plicit Association Test( SC- IAT)
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献275

共引文献401

同被引文献106

  • 1陈文锋,张建新.积极/消极情感量表中文版的结构和效度[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(11):763-765. 被引量:110
  • 2戴春林,吴明证,杨治良.个体攻击性结构与自尊关系研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(1):44-46. 被引量:41
  • 3赵国祥,陈欣.初中生感戴维度研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(6):1300-1302. 被引量:52
  • 4温芳芳,佐斌.评价单一态度对象的内隐社会认知测验方法[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):828-833. 被引量:48
  • 5严标宾,郑雪.大学生生活满意度与主观幸福感关系的文化效应检验[J].心理科学,2007,30(6):1337-1341. 被引量:28
  • 6Asendorpf,J. B., Banse, R., & Mticke, D. (2002), Double dis- sociation between implicit and explicit personality self - con- cept:The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and So- cial Psychology,83(2) ,380.
  • 7Banse,R. ,Seise,J. ,& Zerbes,N. (2001), Implicit attitudes to- wards homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrifi fr Experimentelle Psychologie , 48 ( 2 ) , 145 - 160.
  • 8Gawronski, B. , & Bodenhausen, G. V. ( 2006 ), Associative and propositional processes in evaluation:An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132 (5) ,692.
  • 9Gawronski, B. , & LeBel, E. P. (2008), Understanding patterns of attitude change: When implicit measures show change, but explicit measures do not. Journal of Experimental Social Psy- chology,44 (5), 1355 - 1361.
  • 10Greenwald,A. G. ,McGhee,D. E. ,& Schwartz,J. L. K. (1998), Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition:The im- plicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psy- chology,74(6) ,1464.

引证文献7

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部