摘要
关于临摹作品可否受到著作权保护的问题在学术界一直饱受争议,2001年《中华人民共和国著作权法》的修改,将"临摹"从复制的手段中剔除,这一变化,在某种程度上体现出立法者思想的一个转变。通过对"临摹"和"复制"两个概念进行区分,进而论述独创性含义以及对作品构成要件的解析,得出临摹品具有独创性,且应受到著作权法保护的结论。
Whether a copy, which is made in a certain Chinese traditional way, can be protected by copyright has long been a highly controversial issue in academia. In 2001, legislators for the amendment of Copyright Law changed the definition of ＂ the right of reproduction＂, which took ＂copying＂ out as a method of reproducing. Such a change indicated a shift in legislators＇ attitude towards copies to a cer- tain extend. In this essay, the author distinguishes Chinese traditional copying from reproducing and discusses the reasons why such kind of copies have originality and shall be under the protection of Copyright Law.
出处
《江苏技术师范学院学报》
2013年第3期136-140,共5页
Journal of Jiangsu Teachers University of Technology
