摘要
文章采用数量与质量相结合的引文分析方法构建了一对新的期刊评价指标,期刊贡献值(JCV)和期刊贡献因子(JCF),并对2009年JCR(科学版)收录的7 387种期刊进行实证研究。结果表明,JCV和JCF排序结果与学术界的定性评价比较吻合,名列前茅的期刊均是各学科的著名期刊,且以原创性期刊为主;新指标对期刊被引量的突然变化反应相对平稳,且能抑制过度自引提升排序的现象;新指标虽然采用影响因子(IF)表征引用价值权重,但并不偏向于高IF的期刊;相关性研究表明,JCV和JCF有很好的自洽性。
This article suggests a new couple of indicators for journal evaluation: Journal Contribution Value (JCV) and Journal Contribution Factor (JCF), which take into account not citations. The JCV and JCF of 7 387 journals in JCR Science Edition 2009 only the quantity but also the quality of have been calculated. The result shows that the journal rankings by JCV and JCF correspond well with the general understanding of journal status by ex- perts. All the top journals are the most famous journals in their subjects and most of them are original journals. The new evaluation methods can effectively reduce the maneuverability and human intervention conducted by evaluated journal itself. JCV and JCF have good self-consistency.
出处
《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第4期101-106,共6页
Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
关键词
期刊评价
引文分析
期刊贡献值
期刊贡献因子
影响因子
journal evaluation
citation analysis
journal contribution value (JCV)
journal contribution factor(JCF)
impact factor(IF)