期刊文献+

中国近海ASCAT风场反演结果验证分析 被引量:9

Validation of ASCAT wind vectors in the China Sea
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用NCEP风场产品和dropsonde探测资料,对中国近海ASCAT全场和单点的风速反演精度进行验证分析。研究发现ASCAT反演风场与NCEP风场的风速、风向平均绝对偏差分别为2.06 m/s和21.98°;均方根误差分别为2.87 m/s和34.29°。两者风速反演精度较一致,风向误差相对偏大。ASCAT反演风场与dropsonde探测资料的风速、风向平均绝对偏差分别为1.55 m/s和3.43°;均方根误差分别为1.73 m/s和4.15°。ASCAT资料可以较好的反演台风风场。 Based on NCEP wind data and dropsonde observational data, the accuracy of ASCAT wind products in the China Sea is validated. The results indicates that the mean absolute differences between ASCAT and NCEP data were 2.06 m/s (wind speed) and 21.98°(wind direction) based on the 845 matching samples. Meanwhile, the root-mean-square differences were 2.87 m/s (wind speed) and 34.29°(wind direction). The wind speed retrieval accuracy from ASCAT is close to NCEP while the wind direction difference is relatively large. The mean abso- lute differences between ASCAT and dropsonde data were 1.55 m/s (wind speed) and 3.43° (wind direction) on the basis of 7 matching samples. The root-mean-square differences between them were 1.73 m/s (wind speed) and 4.15°(wind direction). Hence, the ASCAT wind products well retrieval the tropical cyclones wind field.
出处 《海洋预报》 北大核心 2013年第4期27-33,共7页 Marine Forecasts
基金 国家自然科学基金(41276018)和(41275113)
关键词 风速 散射计 ASCAT NCEP dropsonde sea surface wind scatterometer ASCAT NCEP dropsonde
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Myers P G, Haines K, Josey S. On the importance of the choice o1 wind stress forcing to the modeling of the Mediterranean Sea cir-[ culation[J]. J Geophys Res, 1998, 103:15729-15749. /.
  • 2Paolo M R, Salvatore M, Fabrizio D, et al. Comparison of ana- lyzed and measured wind speeds in the perspective of oceanic simulations over the Mediterranean basin: Analyses, QuikSCAT and buoy data[J]. Journal of Marine Systerms, 2008, 70:33-48.
  • 3Weller R A, Anderson S P. Surface meteorology and air-sea flux- es in the western equatorial pacific warm pool during TOGA cou- pled ocean-atmosphere response experiment[J]. J Climate, 1996, 9: 1959-1990.
  • 4Weller R A, Baumgartner M F, Josey S A, et al. Atmospheric forc- ing in the Arabian Sea during 1994-1995:observations and com- parisons with climatology and models[J]. Deep-Sea Res, 1998, Part II 45: 1961-1999.
  • 5Mears C, Smith D, Wentz F J. Comparison of SSM/I and buoy-measured wind speeds from 1987-1997[J]. J Geophys. Res, 2001, 106(C6): 11719-11729.
  • 6Ebuchi N, Graber H C, Caruso M J. Evaluation of wind vectors observed by QuikSCAT/SeaWinds using ocean buoy data[J].J. At- mos. Oceanic Technol., 2002, 19:2049-2062.
  • 7Pickett M H, Tang W, Rosenfeld L K, et al. QuikSCAT satellitecomparison with nearshore buoy wind data offthe U.S. west coast[J], J Atmos Oceanic Technol, 2003, 20:1869-1879.
  • 8Draper D W, Long D G, An assessment of SeaWinds on Qui- kSCAT wind retrieval[J]. J Geophys Res, 2002, 107C: 3212. doi: 10.1029/2002JC001330.
  • 9Chelton D B, Freilich M H. Scatterometer-based assessment of 10-m wind analyses from the operational ECMWF and NCEP nu- merical weather prediction models[J]. Mon Weather Rev, 2005, 2: 409-429.
  • 10Brennan M J, Hennon C C, Knabb R D. The operational use of QuikSCAT ocean surface vector winds at the National Hurricane Center[J]. Weather Forecasting, 2009, 24:621-645.

二级参考文献21

  • 1陶祖钰,田佰军,黄伟.9216号台风登陆后的不对称结构和暴雨[J].热带气象学报,1994,10(1):69-77. 被引量:91
  • 2陈联寿,罗哲贤.不同尺度涡旋相互作用对台风的结构和移动的影响[J].热带气象学报,1995,11(1):10-17. 被引量:15
  • 3李小凡.台风涡旋的结构及其与台风运动的关系[J].热带气象学报,1996,12(4):314-323. 被引量:6
  • 4TONKIN H, HOLLAND G J, HOLBROOK N, et al. An evaluation of thermodynamic estimates of climatological maximum potential tropical cyclones intensity[J]. Mort Wea Rev, 2000, 128(3): 746-762.
  • 5MARKS F D, SHAY L K. Landfalling tropical cyclones: Forecast problems and associated research opportunities[J]. Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 1998, 79(2): 305-323.
  • 6ELSBERRY R L, MARKS JR F D. Hurricane Landfall Workshop report[R/OL], http://boox.mmm.cuar.edu/uswrp. [1998-05-01], Tech Note 442, National Center for Atmospheric Research, 1998: 40.
  • 7DEMARIA M, HUBER M. The effect of vertical shear on tropical cyclone intensity changes: An historical perspective[C]//Preprints Symp On Topical Cyclone Intensity Change. Phoenix: Amer Meteor Soc, 1998: 22-29.
  • 8I HALVERSON J B, SIMPSON J, HEYMSFIELD G, et al. Warm core structure of Hurricane Erin Diagnosed from high altitude dropsondes during CAMEX-4[J]. J Atmos Sci, 2006, 63(1): 309-324.
  • 9FRANK W M. The structure and energetics of the tropical cyclone I: Storm structure[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 1977, 105(9): 1 119-1 135.
  • 10KEPERT J D. Observed boundary layer wind structure and balance in the hurricane core Part I: Hurricane Georges[J]. J Atmos Sci, 2006, 63(9): 2 169-2 193.

共引文献6

同被引文献74

引证文献9

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部