期刊文献+

基于行为运作的供应链牛鞭效应研究综述 被引量:3

Review of Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chain Based on Behavioral Operations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 牛鞭效应对供应链效益会造成不良影响。基于完全理性人假设的传统理论,如运作管理、契约理论、博弈论和委托代理理论等,人们对牛鞭效应的成因和解决方案进行了较充分的研究。认为:牛鞭效应的主要成因在于运作管理中的四种主要因素(需求信号处理、限量供应、批量订货方式和价格波动),以及供应链协调、利益分配和供应链结构等方面存在的设计缺陷。但是没有考虑人的行为因素,即人的个体决策偏差和社会偏好也会影响供应链牛鞭效应的形成。个体决策偏差中的过度自信、有限理性以及锚定与调整,会对供应链牛鞭效应的形成产生显著影响。社会偏好中的信任也会对牛鞭效应产生重要影响。最后指出了行为因素对影响牛鞭效应的未来研究方向。 The bullwhip effect badly affects the efficiency of supply chain. Based on the rational agent hypothesis, researchers have studied causes and mitigation strategies of the bullwhip effect sufficiently from operation management, contract theory, game theory and principal theory. Demand signal processing, limited supplying, lot-for-lot orders and price volatility are the main factors that cause bullwhip eft^cl. Defects in coordination, distribution of benefits and structure of supply chain also affect bullwhip. Behavioral factors are not included in these theories. Individual decision bias and social preferences can also cause the bullwhip effect. Individual decision bias, including underestimation, overreaction, bounded rationality, anchoring and adjustment, can have impacts on bullwhip significantly. Trust, a kind of social preferences, can also cause bullwhip in supply chain management. At last, future research directions are pointed out.
作者 许民利 周依
机构地区 中南大学商学院
出处 《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2013年第5期43-51,共9页 Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金 教育部人文社科基金资助项目(09YJC630230) 湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(10JJ3023)
关键词 行为运作 牛鞭效应 供应链 个体决策偏差 behavioral operations bullwhip effect supply chain individual decision bias
  • 相关文献

参考文献62

  • 1Lee H,Padmanabhan P,Whang S.Information distortion in a supply chain:the bullwhip effect[J].Management Science,1997,43(4):546-558.
  • 2Forrester.Industrial dynamic[M].New York:MIT Press and Wiley & Sons,Inc,1961.
  • 3GearyS,Disney S M,Towill D R.On bullwhip in supply chains-historical review,present practice and expected future impact[J].International Journal of Production Economics,2006,101 (1):2-18.
  • 4达庆利,张钦,沈厚才.供应链中牛鞭效应问题研究[J].管理科学学报,2003,6(3):86-93. 被引量:152
  • 5刘作仪,查勇.行为运作管理:一个正在显现的研究领域[J].管理科学学报,2009,12(4):64-74. 被引量:83
  • 6Burbidge J L.Automated production control with a simulation capability[R].IFIP Working Paper,1984.
  • 7Sterman J D.Modeling managerial behavior: misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment[J].Management Science,1989,35 (3):321-339.
  • 8Lee H,Padmanabhan P,Whang S.Information distortion supply chains[J].Sloan Management Rev,1997,38 (3):93-102.
  • 9Cachon G P,Lariviere M A.Capacity allocation using past sales:when to turn-and-earn[J].Management Science,1999,45 (5):685-703.
  • 10Cachon G P,Lariviere M A.Capacity choice and allocation:strategic behavior and supply chain per formance[J].Management Science,1999,45 (8):1091-1108.

二级参考文献223

  • 1冯春,谢进,陈永.混沌分形优化方法及其应用[J].系统工程学报,2004,19(4):337-343. 被引量:7
  • 2严志辉,钟美瑞,黄健柏.基于过度自信的多任务委托——代理模型扩展研究[J].系统工程,2006,24(2):19-22. 被引量:15
  • 3Box,G.E.P G.M.Jenkins 等.时间序列分析:预测与控制[M].中国统计出版社,1997..
  • 4季建华(译).供应链设计与管理[M].上海:远东出版社,2000..
  • 5Weiss H J, Mark E G. Production and Operations Management[ M]. Allyn and Bacon. 1989.
  • 6Gino F, Pisano G. Toward a theory of behavioral operations [ J ]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2008, 10(4) : 676-691.
  • 7Malhotra D. Trust and reciprocity decisions: The differing perspectives of trustors and trusted parties [ J ]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2004, 94(2) : 61-73.
  • 8Fehr E, Gachter S. Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity[ J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2000, 14: 159-181.
  • 9Fehr E, Gachter S. Altruistic punishment in humans [ J ]. Nature, 2002, 415 : 137-140.
  • 10Fehr E, Schmidt K M. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation[ J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999, 114 : 817-868.

共引文献415

同被引文献32

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部