期刊文献+

与著作权有关的价格垄断

Price Monopoly Related to Copyright
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国、日本和欧洲都曾经发生过与著作权有关的价格垄断案例,主要涉及五方面问题:美国批量预定电影过程中的横向价格限制,一般都判决违法;著作权集体管理过程中的横向价格限制,经历了由否定到容忍的过程;与著作权有关的纵向价格限制,一般都判决违法;畸高的著作权使用费和与著作权有关的低价倾销,一般不予认定;与著作权有关的价格歧视,较难认定并且存在例外的豁免。梳理、总结各国法院的判决规律及其背后理由,可以为我国未来的知识产权反垄断规制提供借鉴。 There were cases about price monopoly related to copyright in United States, Japan and European Community. These cases involved five aspects. Horizontal price restrictions in batch reserving of films in United States were usually judged to be illegal. Horizontal price restrictions in copyright collective stewardship have undergone the process of being negated to being tolerated. Longitudinal price restrictions related to copyright were usually judged to be illegal. The excessively high copyright royalty and price dumping about copyright were rare. Price discriminations related to copyright were also rare and they were remitted in some exceptions. To summarize regular pattern in verdicts of court of various countries and their reasons by researching these cases may provides references to our future antimonopoly governing on intellectual property.
作者 郭德忠
出处 《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2013年第5期129-133,共5页 Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助项目"知识产权滥用的反垄断矫正"(10YJA820025)
关键词 著作权 价格垄断 集体管理 copyright price monopoly collective stewardship
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1根岸哲,舟田正之.日本禁止垄断法概论(第3版)[M].王为农,陈杰,译.北京:中国法制出版社.2007:161.
  • 2Jay Dratler Jr.知识产权许可[M].王春燕,郭禾,金海军,等,译.北京:清华大学出版社,2003:391.
  • 3歪歪.中国人比美国、日本人富吗?[N].重庆:电脑报,1998-09-07(9).
  • 4李韶辉.我国反价格垄断取得突破性进展[N].北京:中国改革报,2011-12-26(1).
  • 5俞岚,周锐.中国首次制裁境外企业价格垄断,三星等被罚3.53亿[EB/OL].(2013-01-04)[2013-02-16].中国新闻网,2013-1-4.http://finance.eastmoney.com/news/1345,20130104266379650_2.htrnl,2013-06-02.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部