摘要
目的分析在宫颈原位癌治疗中电热圈环切术的诊疗效果。方法对2005—2012年于我院诊治的宫颈原位癌患者83例,其中31例施电热圈环切术,52例施阴式全子宫切除术,比较两种手术的各项指标。结果两种方式在在手术用时、手术出血情况上存在统计学差异(P<0.05),在术后观察指标上差别不具统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论电热圈环切术是诊断及治疗宫颈原位癌的重要方式,适合需要保留生育功能的患者,阴式全子宫切除术更适合无生育需求的患者。
Objective To analyze the electric heating circle fibrotomy in cervical carcinoma in situ treatment of diagnosis and treatment effect. Methods From 2005 to 2005 in our hospital make a diagnosis and give treatment, 83 cases of patients with cervical carcinoma in situ, including 31 cases fibrotomy electric heating circle, 52 cases of Yin type total hysterectomY, compare the indicators of two kinds of surgery. Results In two ways on the surgical time, surgical bleeding statistical differences (P〈O.05), difference in postoperative observation indicators do not have statistical significance (P〉O.05). Conclusion Electric heating circle fibrotomy is an important method of diagnosis and treatment of cervical carcinoma in situ, is suitable for the patient needs to retain reproductive function and Yin type total hysterectomy is more suitable for patients with fertility requirements.
出处
《中国卫生产业》
2013年第26期31-31,33,共2页
China Health Industry
关键词
宫颈原位癌
电热圈环切术
阴式全子宫切除术
Cervical carcinoma in situ
Electric heating circle ring cut method
Yin type total hysterectomy