摘要
目的通过采用关节镜下微创手术和保守治疗2种方法对比,研究合适的办法治疗半月板撕裂。方法 A组采用关节镜下微创手术,术后口服药物加关节腔注射;B组口服药物加关节腔注射。结果按照Lysholm膝关节评分系统评定,对所有患者进行评分。发现两组之间疗效比较P<0.05差异具有统计学意义。结论半月板撕裂不能自行愈合,必须进行手术处理,术后严格指导关节功能锻炼多能取得良好效果。通过2组数据的比较,我们可以肯定,关节镜下微创手术治疗半月板撕裂效果明显优于保守治疗,值得推广。
Objective Arthroscopic minimally invasive surgical and conservative treatment methods contrast, on an appropriate way to treat a torn meniscus. Methods A group was treated with arthroscopic operation, postoperative oral drugs plus joint cavity injection; group B by oral drugs combined with intra-articular injection. Results According to Lysholm knee scoring system, the score for all patients. Found between the two groups, effects of P 〈0.05 was statistically significant. Conclusion Meniscus tear can not be self-healing, surgical treatment must be carried out strict guidance after joint functional exercise and more able to achieve good results.2 sets of data comparison, we can be sure, arthroscopic minimally invasive surgery for a torn meniscus is better than conservative treatment is worth promoting.
出处
《中国卫生产业》
2013年第26期43-43,45,共2页
China Health Industry
关键词
半月板
关节镜
微创手术
临床疗效
The me^iscal
Arthroscopy
Minimally invasive surgery
Clinical efficacy