期刊文献+

超临界CO_2萃取不同强化方法的比较与动力学模型 被引量:1

Comparison and Dynamic Models of Supercritical CO_2 Extraction Enhanced by Different Technologies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了改善单纯超临界CO2萃取在应用范围和萃取效率方面存在的不足,试验以人参中人参皂苷为萃取对象,研究了夹带剂强化超临界CO2萃取(SCE)、超声联合夹带剂强化超临界CO2萃取(USCE)、超临界CO2反相微乳强化萃取(SCRME)和超声强化超临界CO2反相微乳萃取(USCRME)四种不同强化方法对超临界CO2萃取的影响,并由微分质量衡算模型,建立了SC萃取人参皂苷的动力学模型。试验结果表明,在各自优化的工艺条件下,SCE、USCE、SCRME、USCRME萃取的皂苷产率分别达0.26%、0.45%、0.76%和1.15%,萃取速率顺序为与萃取产率相同,所建萃取动力学模型与各试验数据的拟合度均超过99.5%,其中以USCRME的模型模拟得出的E∞和k值最大,分别为1.213%和0.659,是SCE的3.95倍和1.32倍,说明在超临界CO2萃取过程中同时引入超声和反相微乳技术能提高对极性物质的萃取产率和萃取速率。 In order to extend the scope and improve the efficiency of supercrifical CO2 extraction, four enhanced technologies including supercritical CO2 extraction with modifier (SCE), supercritical CO2 extraction with ultrasound combined modifier(USCE), supercritical CO2 reverse microemulsion extraction (SCRME) and supercritical CO2 reverse microemulsion extraction with ultrasound0dSCRME) were applied to extract ginsenosides from ginseng. Their extracting kinetic models were built based on transfer theory and principle of mass balance. The results showed that the extraction yields of ginsensides by SCE, USCE, SCRME and USCRME were 0.26%, 0.45%, 0.76% and 1.15%, respectively. The extraction rates of ginsensides by four methods showed similar order to the extraction yield. The fitting degree of the model and the experimental data was more than 99.5%. The maximum Eoo (1.213%) and k (0.659) values were obtained by USCRME model simulation, which were 3.95 and 1.32 times, respectively, of those by SCE. The results demonstrated that supercritical CO2 extraction enhanced by ultransound combined with reverse microemulsion could improve the extraction yield and rate of polar material ginsensides.
出处 《现代食品科技》 EI CAS 北大核心 2013年第8期1921-1925,1861,共6页 Modern Food Science and Technology
基金 河南科技大学校青年基金(2007QN064) 广州市科技计划项目(穗科条字[2002]27号)
关键词 超临界CO2萃取 超声 反相微乳 夹带剂 模型 supercfitical CO2 extraction ultrasound reverse microemulsions modifier model
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Dong X, Su B, Xing H. Cosolvent effects on the diffusions of 1,3-dichlorobenzene, l-carvone, gemniol and 3-fluorophenol in supercritical carbon dioxide [J]. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2011, 58(2): 216-225.
  • 2Bema A, Tarrega A, BLASCO M, et al. Supercritical CO2 extraction of essential oil from orange peel: effect of theheight of the bed [J]. Journal Supercritical Fluids, 2000, 18 (3): 227-237.
  • 3Zhang J L, Han B X. Supercritical CO2-continuous microemulsions and compressed COz-expanded reverse microemulsions [J]. The Joumal of Supercritical Fluids, 2009, 47 (3): 531-536.
  • 4Rieraa E, Blancob A, GARCIAC J, et al. High-power ultrasonic system for the enhancement of mass transfer in supercritical CO2 extraction processes [J]. Ultrasonics, 2010, 50 (2): 306-309.
  • 5Luo D L, Qin T Q, Lu Q extraction of ginsenosides in supercritical CO2 reverse microemulsions [J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2007, 87(3): 341-346.
  • 6罗登林,聂英,钟先锋,辛莉.超声强化超临界CO_2萃取人参皂苷的研究[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(6):256-258. 被引量:23
  • 7Kima S H, Yuvaraja H, Jeonga Y T, et al. The effect of ultrasonic agitation on the stripping of photoresist using supercritical CO2 and co-solvent formulation [J]. Mieroelectronic Engineering, 2009, 86 (2): 171-175.
  • 8Johnston K P, Harrison K L, CLARKE M J, et al. Water-in-carbon dioxide microemulsion: an environment for hydrophiles including proteins [J]. Science. 1996, 271(2): 624-626.
  • 9Cummings S, Enick R, Rogers S, et al. Sarah Rogers, Amphiphiles for supercritical CO2 [J]. Biochimie, 2012, 94(1): 94-100.
  • 10Lesoni L, Boulin O, Crampon C, et al. CO2/water/surfactant ternary systems and liposome formation using supercritical CO2: A review [J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2011, 377(1-3): 1-14.

二级参考文献25

共引文献83

同被引文献10

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部