期刊文献+

替吉奥与奈达铂加同步放疗治疗中晚期食管癌临床观察 被引量:8

S-1 plus nedaplatin and combined with concurrent radiotherapy in the treatment of medium and terminal esophageal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨替吉奥+奈达铂(S1N)、5-氟尿嘧啶+顺铂(FP)方案加同步放疗治疗中晚期食管癌的疗效,毒副反应及耐受性观察。方法 62例中晚期食管癌患者随机分为两组:试验组(S1N方案加同步放疗)30例,对照组(FP方案加同步放疗)32例。放疗均采用钴60-γ线常规分割照射。结果 S1N化放组、FP化放组有效率分别为86.7%、62.5%。S1N化放组的有效率高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。S1N化放组、FP化放组1年生存率分别为73.3%、59.4%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。主要副反应为消化道反应、骨髓抑制,放射性食管炎。FP组消化道反应、静脉炎较重,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。S1N组骨髓抑制较重,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。患者可以耐受,无治疗相关性死亡。结论两方案同步放化疗治疗均可用于中晚期食管癌的综合治疗。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus nedaplatin and combined with concurrent radiotherapy in the treatment of terminal esophageal cancer. Methods From June 2009 to December 2011, 62 patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus were divided into two groups of the experimental group (30 cases) and the control group (32 cases). Radiotherapy was used cobalt 60- γ-line conventional fractionated irradiation. Results The overall response rate (CR+PR) of the experimental group and the control group were 86.7% and 62.5% respectively (P 〈 0.05).The year survival rates of SIN chemoradiotherapy group and FP chemoradiotherapy group were 73.3% and 59.4%, the difference was not statistically significant (P 〉 0.05). The main toxicities were nausea, vomting, marrow depression and radioactive esophagitis. The control group patients had more toxicities. All of them complete treating plan. Conclusion The short term curative effect of S-1 and nedaplatin in combination with radiotherapy is feasible for medium term and terminal esophageal cancer, and toxicity is tolerable.
作者 董俊青
出处 《中国医药科学》 2013年第17期100-101,125,共3页 China Medicine And Pharmacy
关键词 食管癌 化疗 放疗 替吉奥 奈达铂 顺氯氨铂 5-氟尿嘧啶 Esophageal cancer Chemotherapy Radiotherapy S-1 Nedaplatin Cisplatin Fluorouracil
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献23

共引文献88

同被引文献76

  • 1孙国华.西妥昔单抗联合化疗靶向治疗食管癌的疗效观察[J].世界临床医学,2017,11(3):38-38. 被引量:3
  • 2杨学宁,吴一龙.实体瘤治疗疗效评价标准——RECIST[J].循证医学,2004,4(2):85-90. 被引量:1520
  • 3王建飞,应杰儿,马胜林.紫杉醇联合顺铂新辅助化疗方案治疗中晚期食管癌的临床观察[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2007,14(12):961-962. 被引量:15
  • 4Herskovic A, Martz K, SarrafM, et al. Combined chemother apy and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in pa- tients with cancer of the esophagus [J].N EnglJ Med,1992, 326(24):1593 -1598.
  • 5Shirasaka T. Development history and concept of an oralanti- cancer agentS-1 ( TS-1 ).-its clinical usefulness and future vistas[J].Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2009,39 ( 1 ) : 2.
  • 6Tsuda T, Inaba H, Miyazaki A, et al. Prospective study of definl-tire chemoradiotherapy with S-1 and nedaplatin in patients withstage 1 I/m (non-T4) esophageal cancer[J].Esoph agus,2011,8(1) :45-51.
  • 7Shinoto M, Shioyanla Y, Sasaki T, et al. Clinical results of defini-tive chemoradiotherapy for patients with synchronous head andneck squamous cell carcinoma and esophageal cancer [J].Am J Clin Oncol,2011,34(4):362 -366.
  • 8Tepper J,Krasna MJ ,Niedzwiecki D,et al. Phase HI trialof trimodality therapy with cisplatin,fluorouracil,radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone foresophageal cancer: CALGB 9781 [J]. J Clin Oncol,2008,26(7) :1086 -1092.
  • 9Stahl M, Stuschke M, Lehmann N, et al. Chemoradiationwith and without surgery in patients with locally advancedsquamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus [ J ]. J ClinOncol,2005 ,23(10):2310 -2317.
  • 10Bedenne L, Michel P, Bouche 0,et al. Chemoradiationfollowed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alonein squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102 [ J]. JClin Oncol,2007 ,25( 10) : 1160 - 1168.

引证文献8

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部