期刊文献+

社会型塑下的科学共同体:自主与责任 被引量:1

The Scientific Community within the Social Shaping:Autonomy and Responsibility
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自主和责任是科学共同体运行的两大基本原则,促进着科学之求真与向善的结合。在大科学时代,由于社会型塑力量不断从外部影响着科学知识生产,科学共同体的自主和责任发生了某种冲突和嬗变,严重阻碍了社会的创新进步。为了使科学共同体既有更大程度的科学自主,又担当更多的社会责任,应在"为繁荣而自主"和责任伦理观的基础上,走向"创造力共享"的科学治理,从而实现科学进步与社会繁荣的良性循环。 Autonomy and responsibility are the two basic principles of the scientific community which promotes the combination of truth and goodness of science. In the era of great science, the forces of social shaping continue to influence the scientific community and its production of knowledge from the outside so that the autonomy and re- sponsibility of the scientific community begin to conflict and change, which greatly hinders the progress of social in- novation. In order to make the scientific community not only have a greater degree of scientific autonomy but also play more social responsibility, the ethics of autonomy for prosperity and the idea of responsibility should be estab- lished. Then we should carry out the scientific governance of creativity, promote scientific community to achieve a combination of scientific autonomy and social responsibility within the tension between the planning and freedom so as to achieve a virtuous circle of scientific progress and social DrosDeritv.
作者 薛桂波
出处 《山西师大学报(社会科学版)》 北大核心 2013年第5期57-61,共5页 Journal of Shanxi Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金 教育部人文社科研究青年基金项目(11YJC720050)
关键词 社会型塑 科学共同体 自主 责任 科学治理 social shaping scientific community autonomy responsibility scientific governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1[英]约翰·齐曼.真科学--它是什么,它指什么[M].曾国屏,等译.上海:上海世纪出版集团,2008.
  • 2刘大椿.科学伦理:从规范研究到价值反思[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2001,32(2):1-10. 被引量:26
  • 3[美]伯纳德·巴伯.科学与社会秩序[M].北京:三联书店,1991.
  • 4[美]米切姆.技术哲学概论[M].殷登祥,等,译.天津:天津科学技术出版社,1999.86.
  • 5[英]波普尔.走向进化的知识论[M].李本正,范景中译.杭州:中国美术学院出版社,2006.
  • 6[英]约翰·齐曼.元科学导论[M].刘珺珺等译.长沙:湖南人民出版社,1988.209-211,211.
  • 7[美]亨利·埃茨科威兹.三螺旋[M].北京:东方出版社,2005.
  • 8[英] 约翰·齐曼.知识的力量--科学的社会范畴[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1985:122,127.
  • 9[法]皮埃尔·布尔迪厄,刘成富,张艳,译.科学的社会用途-写给科学场的临床社会学[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2005.
  • 10Arnold Wilts. Forms of Research Organization and Their Responsiveness to External Goal Setting [ J 1. Research Policy, 2000, (29).

二级参考文献28

  • 1[3]Dessauer, F. (1956). Streit um die Technik. Frankfurt.
  • 2[4]Hubig C. (Hrsg.) (2000). Nachdenken über Technik: die Klassiker der echnikphilosophie. Berlin.
  • 3[1]Barber, B. J. 1962. Science and the Social Order. New York: Collier.
  • 4[2]Bortnick, J. and Miller, N. R. 1986. Scientific and technical information. In Albert H. Teich and Jill H. Pace (eds.), Science and Technology in the USA. London: Longman.
  • 5[3]Brown, J. S. 1995. Contribution in report on: Workshop to Assess Corporate Research Restructuring. National Academy of Sciences.
  • 6[4]Bush, V. 1945. Science, the Endless Frontier. Washington DC: Public Affairs Press.
  • 7[5]Cozzens, S. E. 1990. Autonomy and power in science. In S. E. Cozzens and T. F. Gieryn (eds.),Theories of Science in Society. Bloomington: Indian University Press.
  • 8[6]Cozzens, S. E. and Melkers, J. 1998. Use and usefulness of performance measurement in state science and technology programs. Policy Studies Journal.
  • 9[7]England, J. M. 1983. A Patron for Pure Science: The National Science Foundation's Formative Years, 1945-57. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
  • 10[8]Gore, A. 1997. The metaphor of distributed intelligence. Science, 272: 177.

共引文献118

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部