摘要
明代马峦第一个为司马光作年谱,虽有诸多讹误,但勾勒出司马光一生仕宦履历,草创之功不可抹杀。清代陈宏谋所作司马光年谱对马谱作了些删繁订误工作,附于文集后行世,但限于篇幅,价值有限。清代顾栋高所作司马光年谱,采用纲目体的叙述格式,以文谱事,体例在当时极精审,他用力甚勤,又吸取了马谱的精华,故能后出转精。但顾谱仍存在很多缺陷,已不能满足今日学术界的要求。
In Ming Dynasty, Ma Luan first wrote the chronicle of Sima Guang' s life which gives an outline of his official career and his initial achievement though some errors in it. In Qing Dynasty, Chen Hongmou re- vised Ma Luan' s work by deleting the trifles and correcting the errors. Gu Donggao' s vision exceeds the first two by adopting the general outline and Ma' s essence. But Gu' s vision has some deficiency and cannot meet the present academic needs.
出处
《运城学院学报》
2013年第4期36-39,共4页
Journal of Yuncheng University
关键词
司马光年谱
马峦
陈宏谋
顾栋高
the Chronicle of Sima Guang
Ma Luan
Chen Hongmou
Gu Donggao