期刊文献+

序贯器官衰竭评分判断肝衰竭患者预后价值 被引量:4

Application of sequential organ failure assessment score in prediction of prognosis in patients with liver failure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA)探讨肝衰竭并发多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)患者预后的价值。方法对118例符合MODS诊断标准的肝衰竭患者进行SOFA评分,比较存活与死亡者临床特征的差异,评判其对肝衰竭合并MODS死亡的判断能力。结果死亡组与生存组患者呼吸系统SOFA得分分别为0.78±0.91和0.13±0.34(P〈0.01),循环系统为0.55±0.85和0.0±0.0(P〈0.05),肾脏得分1.43±1.12和0.38±0.81(P〈0.01);死亡组与生存组患者SOFA总得分分别为10.93±2.21和8.31±1.20(P〈0.05),受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为0.857(标准误0.040,渐进显著性水平P<0.01),渐进95%可信区间为0.778~0.936。当截断点为8分、9分和10分时,阳性预测值分别为89.2%、92.9%和96.0%,阴性预测值分别为57.1%、45.0%和30.2%。结论 MODS患者呼吸、循环和肾脏功能障碍是肝衰竭死亡的独立危险因素,SOFA评分对肝衰竭的预后具有良好的判断能力。 Objective To classify the efficacy of sequential organ failure assessment score(SOFA)in prediction of patients with multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Methods SOFA score was calculated retrospectively in 118 patients with liver failure complicated by MODS. The clinical features of survival patients and dead patients were compared and the prediction value of SOFA score on patient survival was analyzed. Results In the dead patients,SOFA score was 0.78±0.91 for the respiratory system,0.55±0.85 for the circulation system,and 1.43±1.12 for the renal system,however,these scores were significantly higher than that in the survival patients for each corresponding system (0.13±0.34,P〈0.01 for the lung;0.0±0.0,P〈0.05 for the heart;0.38±0.81, P〈0.01 for the renal);For the dead patients,the SOFA total score was 10.93±2.21,which was significantly higher than that for the survival patients (8.31±1.20,P〈0.05);The area under receiver operating characteristic curve of SOFA score was 0.875 (standard error was 0.040,asymptotic significance,P〈0.01),the 95 percent confidence interval was 0.778 to 0.936;When the cut-off value was 8,9 and 10 scores,the positive predictive value was 89.2%, 92.9% and 96.0%,respectively,and the negative predictive value was 57.1%,45.0% and 30.2%,respectively. Conclusion SOFA score was valuable in prediction of prognosis in patients with liver failure. Respiratory, circulation and renal dysfunction were independent risk factors for death in patients with MOSD.
出处 《实用肝脏病杂志》 CAS 2013年第5期430-432,共3页 Journal of Practical Hepatology
关键词 肝衰竭 多器官功能障碍综合征 序贯器官衰竭评分 预后 Liver failure Muhi -organ dysfunction syndrome Sequential organ failure assessment score Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Minne L,Abu-Hanna A,de Jonge E. Evaluation of SOFA- based models for predicting mortality in the ICU:Asystematic review. Crit Care,2008,12(6):R161.
  • 2Liver Failure and Artficial Liver Group,Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases,Chinese Medical Association.肝衰竭诊疗指南[J].实用肝脏病杂志,2006,9(6):321-324. 被引量:188
  • 3Vincent JL,de Mendonca A,Cantraine F,et al. Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units:results of a muhicenter,prospective study. Working group on "sepsis-related problems" of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.Crit Care Med, 1998,26:1793-1800.
  • 4Guarner C,Soriano G. Bacterial translocation and its conse- quences in patients with cirrhosis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepa- tol, 2005,17:27-31.
  • 5Kitchens RL,Thompson PA. Impact of sepsis-induced changes in plasma on LPS interactions with monocytes and plasma lipoproteins:role of soluble CD14,LBP,and acute phase lipoproteins. J Endotoxin Res, 2003,9:113-118.
  • 6殷云勤,韩德五,王新国.肝硬化大鼠门静脉内毒素水平与Child-Pugh分级之间的关系[J].世界华人消化杂志,2006,14(15):1471-1474. 被引量:4
  • 7杨洁,聂青和.肝衰竭与肠道屏障功能障碍[J].实用肝脏病杂志,2010,13(1):66-69. 被引量:26
  • 8Tandon P, Garcia-Tsao G. Bacterial infections,sepsis,and muhiorgan failure in cirrhosis. Semin Liver Dis,2008,28(1 ) :26-42.
  • 9Wasmuth HE,Kunz D,Yagmur E,et al.Patients with acute on chronic liver failure display "sepsis-like" immune paralysis.J Hepatol, 2005,42 ( 2 ) : 195-201,.
  • 10Szabo G,Dolganiue A. Mandrekar P. Pattern recognition recep- tors:a contemporary view on liver diseases.Hepatology,2006,44: 287-298.

二级参考文献67

共引文献216

同被引文献29

引证文献4

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部