期刊文献+

短期佩戴围领对颈椎术后活动度与轴性症状的影响 被引量:10

Influence on cervical axial symptom and the rang of motion caused by short-time duration of wearing a cervical collar
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析颈椎后路术后轴性症状的成因及围领佩戴时间对颈椎活动度及轴性症状的影响。方法2010年1月至2011年9月行颈椎单开门椎管扩大成形术36例为实验组,术后颈围领制动4周。2009年1月至2011年1月颈椎单开门术后22例为对照组,术后围领固定8~12周。并分别对两组患者的术后神经症状改善率、颈椎活动度及轴性症状进行对比。结果两组患者单开门术后以JOA评分缓解率差别无统计学意义。但颈椎总活动度的维持较对照组增加(P〈0.05)。同时术后轴性症状评分与对照组差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论颈椎单开门术后短期佩戴围领在取得良好神经缓解率的同时颈椎活动度得到了较好的维持,轴性症状明显减轻。 Objective To assess the cause of axial symptom and the degree of influence on cervical range of motion and axial symptom caused by the different duration of wearing a cervical collar in patients undergoing open-door laminoplasty. Methods From January 2010 to September 2011, a total of thirty-six patients underwent open-door laminoplasty and wore a cervical collar for 4 weeks .All of them were classified as group A. As the same, from January 2009 to January 2011 twenty-two patients wearing a cervical collar for 8-12 weeks were classified as group B. In both groups the neurologic recovery rate, cervical range of motion and axial symptom were recorded and compared. Results There was no significant difference in the neurologic recovery rate between the two groups. But in group A, the cervical range was maintained effectively than that of group B (P〈0.05). Meanwhile there was significantly difference in axial symptom (P〈0.05). Conclusion Patients treated with open-door laminoplasty, wearing a cervical collar can gain a good neurologic recovery rate, maintain the cervical rangeeffectively and reduce axial symptom obviously.
出处 《医学研究与教育》 CAS 2013年第4期14-18,共5页 Medical Research and Education
关键词 颈椎病 椎板成形术 活动范围 轴性症状 康复 cervicalspondylotic myelopathy laminoplasty range of motion axial symptom rehabilitation
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1KAWAGUCHI Y, MATSUI H, ISHIHARA H, et al. Axial symptoms after en bloc cervical laminoplasty[J]. J Spinal Disord, 1999, 12(5): 392-395.
  • 2潘胜发,孙宇,朱振军,陈景春,刘忠军,蔡钦林.单开门颈椎管扩大椎板成形术后轴性症状与颈椎稳定性的相关观察[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2003,13(10):604-607. 被引量:135
  • 3KAWAGUCHI Y, KANAMORI M, ISHIHARA H, et al. Minimum 10-year follow-up after en bloc cervical laminoplasty[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2003, 411(5): 129 -139.
  • 4陈维善,陈其昕,徐少文.单开门颈椎椎板成形术对颈椎稳定性的影响[J].浙江大学学报(医学版),2001,30(5):222-225. 被引量:8
  • 5FUKUI K, KATAOKA O, SHO T, et al. Pathomechanism, pathogenesis, and results of treatment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy caused by dy-namic canal stenosis[J]. Spine, 2001, 26(13): 1443-148.
  • 6NAKANO N, NAKANO T, NAKANO K. Comparison of the results of laminectomy and open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myeloradicu-lopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament[J]. Spine, 1988, 13(5): 792-794.
  • 7LEE T T, GREEN B A, GROMELSKI E B. Safety and stability of open-door cer-vical expansive laminoplasty[J]. J Spinal Disord. 1.998, 11(6): 12-15.
  • 8BABA H, MAEZAWA Y, FURUSAWA N, et al. Flexibility and alignment of the cervical spine after laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy. A radiographic study[J]. Int Orthop, 1995, 19(5): 116-121.
  • 9KAWAGUCHI Y, MATSUI H, TSUJI H, et al. Changes in serum creatinephosphok- inase MM iso enzyme (CPK-MM)after lumbar spine surgery[J]. Spine, 1997, 22(6):1018-1023.
  • 10YOSHIHARU K, MASAHIKO K, HIROKAZU I, et al. Preventive Measures for axial symptoms following cervieallaminoplasty[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2003, 16(6): 497-501.

二级参考文献27

  • 1Hirabayashi K. Expensive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (Jpn)[J].Shujutsu,1978,32 (10):1159-1163.
  • 2Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H,Ishihara H,et al.Axial symptoms after en bloc cervical laminoplasty[J]. J Spinal Disord,1999,12(5):392-395.
  • 3Hosono N,Yonenobu K,Ono K. Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty[J].Spine, 1996,21 ( 17 ): 1969-1973.
  • 4Bogduk N,Marsland A. The cervical zagapophysial joints as a source of neck pain[J].Spine,1988,13(6):610-617.
  • 5Dwyer A,Aprill C,Bogduk N. Cervical zagapophyseal joint pain patterns l:a study in normal volunteers[J]. Spine,1990,15(4):453--457.
  • 6Nishituzi T. Roentgenographic studies on the cervical spine of patients with cervico-omo-brachial syndrome[J].Cent Jpn J Orthop Traumat,1963,6 (7):890-917.
  • 7White AA, Panjabi MM. The basic kinematics of the humen spine:a review of past and current knowledge[J].Spine,1978,3( 1 ):12-20.
  • 8Tanaka S,Peterson HA,Laws ER. Roentgenological examination of the cervical spine after extensive laminectomy[J].Cent Jpn J Orthop Traumat, 1982,25 (8):1162-1167.
  • 9Tominaga S. study of surgical treatment for spondylotic myelopathy[J].Seikei Geka,1975,26 (6):803-816.
  • 10Wada E,Suzuki S,Kanazawa A,et al. Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Spine,2001,26(13):1443-1448.

共引文献150

同被引文献125

引证文献10

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部