期刊文献+

是认知因素还是动机因素影响了审计人员对证据的态度?——以持续经营能力判断为例 被引量:2

Do Cognitive or Motivational Factors Affect the Auditors' Attitude towards Evidences?——An Experimental Study on Going- Concern Task
下载PDF
导出
摘要 客观因素,如证据呈现顺序会导致审计判断偏误,但动机因素是否会影响审计人员对审计证据的态度?本文利用信念调整模型,考察了认知因素和动机因素对审计人员的审计态度的影响,不仅证实了审计人员在持续经营能力判断中的近因效应,而且发现对持续经营不确定审计意见的自我实现预言效应的预期,同样会引发审计判断偏差。 It is generally believed that the objective factors, such as the order of the audit evidences, will induce audit judgment biases. However, questions remain as to whether motivational factors affect the auditor attitude to evidence. By using the belief - adjustment model,the current research tests both cognitive and motivational factors impact on the auditor' s attitudetoward evidences. The results indicated that: (1) The subjects exhibit a significant recency effect ; (2) The auditors' expectations of self - fulfilling prophe- cy effect do affect their attitudes towards evidence.
作者 朱朝晖
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2013年第2期171-176,共6页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基金 国家社科基金重点项目(13AGL002) 浙江省自然科学基金项目(LY13G020005)
关键词 信念调整模型 近因效应 自我实现预言 持续经营能力判断 belief - adjustment model, recencyeffect, self - fulfilling prophecy, going - concern e-valuation
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1彭桃英,李良师,李岚.审计判断中的时近效应和肯定性倾向——基于持续经营能力判断的实验研究[J].会计研究,2009(11):66-72. 被引量:10
  • 2邢剑锋.心理因素对审计的影响[J].审计研究,2011(5):110-112. 被引量:3
  • 3杨明增,张继勋.经验、努力程度对审计判断偏误的影响研究[J].南开管理评论,2010,13(2):151-158. 被引量:22
  • 4朱朝晖,杨滨.持续经营审计决策动机:一个基于自我实现预言的解释[J].会计之友,2012(30):10-12. 被引量:1
  • 5Ann,V.(2003).Going-concern opinions,auditor switching,and the self-fulfilling prophecy effect examined in the regulatory context of belgium.Journal of Accounting,Auditing & Finance,18 (2),231-253.
  • 6Blay,A.D.,Geiger,M.A.,& North,D.S.(2011).The auditor' s going-concern opinion as a communication of risk.Auditing:A Journal of Practice & Theory,30 (2),77-102.
  • 7Citron,D.B.,& Taffler,R.J.(2001).Ethical behaviour in the U.K.audit profession:The case of the self-fulfilling prophecy under going-concern uncertainties.Journal of Business Ethics,29 (4),353-363.
  • 8Citron,D.B.,& Tafller,R.J.(2008).Delays in reporting price-sensitive information:The case of going concern.Journal of Accounting & Public Policy,27 (1),19-37.
  • 9Guiral,A.,Gonzalo,J.A.,& Rodgers,W.(2007).Information content and recency effect of the audit report in loan rating decisions.Accounting and Finance,47 (2),285-304.
  • 10Guiral,A.,Ruiz,E.& Rodgers,W.(2011).To what extent are auditors' attitudes toward the evidence influenced by the self-fulfilling prophecy? Auditing:A Journal of Practice and theory,30(1),173-190.

二级参考文献39

  • 1莱茵哈德.泽尔滕.博弈论与实验研究[J].南开管理评论,2006,9(1):11-12. 被引量:4
  • 2张继勋,刘成立,杨明增.中国审计判断质量的实验研究[J].南开管理评论,2006,9(6):45-49. 被引量:25
  • 3杨明增,张继勋.审计判断中的锚定效应研究[J].审计研究,2007(4):43-47. 被引量:34
  • 4Messier, Jr. W. F., Tubbs, R. M.. Recency Effects in Belief Revision: the Impact of Audit Experience and the Review Process. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 1994, 13(1): 57-72.
  • 5Cushing, B. E., Ahlawat, S.. Mitigation of Recency Bias in Audit Judgment: The Effect of Documentation. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 1996, 15(2): 110-122.
  • 6Ashton, R. H., Kennedy, J.. Eliminating Recency With Self-Review: the Case of Auditors' Going Concern Judgments. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2002, 15: 221-231.
  • 7Favere-marchesi, M.. "Order Effect" Revisited: the Importance of Chronology. Auditing: Journal of Practice and theory, 2006, 25(1): 69-83.
  • 8Nickerson, R. S.. Confirmation Bias: An Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises. Review of General Psychology, 1998, 2(2): 175-220.
  • 9Kida, T.. The Impact of Hypothesis-Testing Strategies on Auditors' Use of Judgment Data. Journal of Accounting Research, 1984, 22(1): 332-340.
  • 10Anderson, B.. An Examination of Factors Affecting Auditors' Hypothesis Testing Strategies: Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts, 1988.

共引文献30

同被引文献9

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部