摘要
近代是西学东渐的时代,也是第一次全面梳理诸子百家之间的关系,对中国本土文化予以整合的时代。在对这些问题的认识上,康有为、梁启超的观点相去甚远:在对诸子百家关系的认定上,康有为宣称"百家皆孔子之学",梁启超认为老子、孔子和墨子是中国文化的"三位大圣";在对中国本土文化的整合上,康有为以孔教称谓中国本土文化,梁启超则直接使用国学概念。这些差异反映了两人不同的文化理念和思想侧重。
In early modem age, Chinese scholars began to receive European thoughts and thoroughly sort traditional Chinese phil cal schools and indigenous cultures. In the undertakings, Kang Youwei and Liang Qichao developed totally different views of point. In terms of the relationships between traditional schools, Kang Youwei claims that "all schools originate from Confucius" , while Liang Qichao believes Lao Tse, Confucians and Mo Tse being "Three Grand Sages" of Chinese culture; as for the integration of Chinese native culture, Kang Youwei calls it with the name Confucianism while Liang Qichao names it as National Studies (Guo Xue) . Those differences show the two scholars" different cultural philosophies and inclinations.
出处
《井冈山大学学报(社会科学版)》
2013年第5期55-61,共7页
Journal of Jinggangshan University(Social Sciences)
基金
国家社科基金项目"国学与近代文化形态研究"(项目编号10BZX039)
关键词
康有为
梁启超
孔学
国学
比较研究
Kang Youwei
Liang Qichao
Confucianism
National Studies
comparison