期刊文献+

微量稀释法测定抗真菌剂对酵母菌MIC的评价 被引量:20

Evaluation of the broth microdilution mehod for the determinations of the MIC s of antifungal agents against yeasts
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 评价微量稀释法测定抗真菌剂对酵母菌最低抑菌浓度 (MICs)的可靠性和实用性。方法 应用微量稀释法和参考常量稀释法测定 5种抗真菌剂对 10 6株临床分离的酵母菌及 2株ATCC质控菌的MICs。结果 微量稀释法测得对念珠菌MICs 结果 (4 8h)与参考方法 (4 8h)比较 ,在± 1稀释度范围内总符合率为 93 2 % ,2株新型隐球菌 72h测定结果与参考方法相同。对 2株ATCC质控菌各测定 5 0次 ,则测定结果在质控中位数± 1稀释范围度内总符合率为 95 8%。结论 微量稀释法测定抗真菌剂对酵母菌MICs,其方法简便、结果准确可靠、重复性好 ,适合于常规工作。 Objective To evaluation the reliability and practicality of the broth microdilution method for the determinations of the minimal inhibitory concentrations(MIC s)of antifungal agents against yeasts.Methods The MIC s of the five antifungal agents against 106 yeasts isolated from clinical samples and 2 quality control strains were obtained from American Type Culture Collection were determined by the broth microdilution and the reference macrodilution methods.Resultsts The overall agreement within ±1 dilution of the reference macrodilution for the five antifungal agents against Candida spp.was 93 2%,when the MIC s were determined at 48 h by the broth microdilution method.Excellent agreement can also be observed for the five antifungal agents against 2 Cryptococcus neoformans isolates at the 72 h readings.General agreement of the MIC s within ±1 dilution for the five drugs tested against 2 quality control strains determined by the broth microdilution method was 95 8%.Conclusion These preliminary data indicate that the broth microdilution technique is a convenient,accurate and reliable method and suitable for the routine use in clinical laboratory.
出处 《临床检验杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2000年第6期331-332,335,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science
关键词 酵母菌 微量稀释法 MIC 抗真菌法 药敏试验 drug sensitivity yeasts microdilution met
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[1] National committee for clinical laboratory standards.Refer ence met hod for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts;Approved stan dard[S].NCCLS document M27?A.Wayne,Pennsylvania:NCCLS,1997,17(9)∶1?13.
  • 2[2] Espinel?Ingroff A,Pfaller M A,Messer S A,et al.Multicenter co mparison of the sensititre yeast one colorimetric antifungal panel with the naio nal committee for clinical laboratory standards M27?A reference method for test ing clinical isolates of common and emerging Candida spp.,Cryptococcus spp.,and other yeasts and yeast?like organisms[J].J Clin Microbiol,1999,37(3)∶591.
  • 3[3] Espinel?Ingroff A.Etest for antifungal susceptibility testing of ye asts[J].Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis,1994,19(4)∶217.
  • 4[4] Van Eldere J,Joosten L,Verhaeghe A,et al.Fluconazole and ampho tericin B antifungal susceptibility testing by national committee for clinical l aboratory standards broth microdilution method compared with Etest and semiau tomated broth microdilution test[J].J Clin Microbiol,1996,34(4)∶842.
  • 5[5] Rodriguez?tudela J L,Martinez?suarez J V.Improved medi um for fluconazole susceptibility testing of Candida albicans[J].Antimic rob Agents Chemother,1994,38(1)∶45.
  • 6[6] Espinel?Ingroff A,Pfaller M A,Erwin M E,et al.Interlaboratory e valuation of Etest method for testing antifungal susceptibilities of pathogenic yeasts to five antifungal agents by using casitone agar and solidified RPMI 1640 medium with 2% glucose[J].J Clin Microbiol,1996,34(4)∶848.

同被引文献123

引证文献20

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部