期刊文献+

基于CVaR准则的单制造商两零售商供应链决策模型与协调 被引量:3

The decision models and coordination of supply chain w ith one manufacturers and tw o retailer based on CVaR criterion
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对单制造商和两零售商组成的供应链,假定产品存在次品需返修、产品需求为随机的且受到产品质量和零售商促销努力的影响,运用均衡分析方法建立了零售商为风险中性时的供应链集中式决策模型和分散式决策模型,给出了协调供应链的回购加促销补贴合同。然后基于条件风险值准则建立了零售商为风险厌恶时的供应链集中式决策模型和分散式决策模型,给出了协调该供应链的回购加促销补贴合同。最后的算例表明了模型的合理性和协调合同的有效性。研究表明:零售商越厌恶风险,其订货量越少,制造商、零售商和供应链的收益都将下降;而产品正品率的提高有利于供应链各方;零售商为风险中性时的供应链决策是零售商为风险厌恶者的特例。 Considering one supply chain consisting of one manufacturer and two retailers with the random demand de- pendent on product quality due to the inferior products and retailer' s sale promotion. The centralized and decentralized decision models were set up respectively by using the equilibrium method when two retailers are risk-neutral. A buy- back plus promotion subsidy contract was put forward to coordinate the supply chain. Then the centralized and decen- tralized decision models based on CVaR criterion are set up respectively when two retailers are risk-averse, together with a buy-back plus promotion subsidy contract to coordinate this supply chain. Final example demonstrates the reasonability of the proposed models and feasibility of the coordinative contracts. The study reveals that the more risk-averse retailers are, the less order quantities are, which leads to lower profits of manufacturer, retailers and whole supply chain; yet the enhancement of qualified product' s rate benefits all agents; the decisions of supply chain with risk-neutral retailers are special cases of those with risk-averse retailers.
出处 《山东大学学报(理学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第7期101-110,共10页 Journal of Shandong University(Natural Science)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70961006) 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(20100481186) 中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目(2012T50593)
关键词 促销努力 条件风险值准则 决策模型 回购加促销补贴合同 sale promotion conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) criterion decision models buy-back plus promotion subsidy contract
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献122

共引文献347

同被引文献45

  • 1许明辉,于刚,张汉勤.带有缺货惩罚的报童模型中的CVaR研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(10):1-8. 被引量:92
  • 2Singley R B, Williams M. Free riding in retail stores: An in- vestigation of its perceived prevalence and costs [ J]. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 1995, 3(2) : 64-74.
  • 3Wu D. Implications of reduced search cost and free riding in E-commerce [J]. Marketing Science, 2004, 23(2):255- 262.
  • 4Shin J. How does free riding on customer service affect com- petition [J]. Marketing Science, 2007, 26(4):488-503.
  • 5Fernando Bernstein, Jing-Sheng Song, Xiaona Zheng. Free riding in a multi-channel supply chain [ J ]. Naval Research Logistics. 2009. 56(8): 745-765,.
  • 6Xing D H, Liu T M. Sales effort free riding and coordination with price match and channel rebate [ J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 219(2) : 264-271.
  • 7Rockafellar R T, Uryasev S. Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions [ J]. Journal of Banking & Fi- nance, 2002, 26(7) : 1443-1471.
  • 8Xu G Y, Dan B, Zhang X M. Coordinating a dual-channel supply chain with risk-averse under a two-way revenue sha- ring contract[ J]. International Journal of Production Eco- nomics, Part A, 2014, 147( 1 ) : 171-179.
  • 9肖迪,黄培清,夏海洋.基于品牌差异的供应链间价格竞争策略研究[J].上海管理科学,2007,29(6):1-4. 被引量:7
  • 10ROCKAFELLAR R T, URYASEV S. Optimization of conditionalvalue-at-risk[J]. Journal of Risk, 2000,2(3): 21-42.

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部