期刊文献+

弹性成像与超声造影诊断桥本氏甲状腺炎合并恶性结节的临床价值 被引量:8

Value of ultrasonic elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosing hashimoto's thyroiditis combining with malignant nodule
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价超声弹性成像与超声造影(CEUS)对桥本氏甲状腺炎合并恶性结节的诊断价值。方法对42例诊断为桥本氏甲状腺炎患者的95个结节分别进行超声弹性成像及CEUS检查,将超声诊断结果与病理结果进行对照。结果以弹性评分≥3分为高度恶性预测指标,超声弹性成像诊断的敏感性67.74%、特异性87.50%、准确性81.05%;以不均匀增强为恶性结节的诊断标准,则CEUS的诊断的敏感性90.32%、特异性92.19%、准确性91.57%。结论 CEUS在桥本氏甲状腺炎合并恶性结节的诊断上较超声弹性成像更有价值。 Objective To assess the value of ultrasonic elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in diagnosing hashimoto's thyroiditis combining with malignant nodule. Methods 42 cases which had been diagnesed with hashimoto's thyroiditis with 95 tyroid nodule were received by ultrasonic elastography and CEUS.Then,the ultrasonic findings were confirmed by pathology. Results 3-4 of elastogram score was high malignancy predict indicator, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ultrasonic elastography were 67.74%, 87.50%, 81.05% ; respectively, inhomogeneous enhancement was the diagnosis of malignant nodule, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CEUS were 90.32%, 92.19% ,91.57%. Conclusion CEUS is more higher value than ultrasonic elastography in the diagnosis of hashimoto's thyroiditis combining with malignant nodule.
出处 《中国现代医生》 2013年第27期82-84,F0003,共4页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 超声检查 弹性成像 超声造影 桥本氏甲状腺炎 甲状腺结节 Ultrasonography Elastography Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Hashimoto's thyroiditis Thyroid nodule
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献78

共引文献410

同被引文献60

  • 1严昆,陈敏华,杨薇,戴莹,尹珊珊,王艳滨,霍苓.超声造影评价肝恶性肿瘤射频治疗疗效──与常规超声及增强CT比较[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2005,14(9):655-658. 被引量:43
  • 2张敏,张毅.益气化痰消瘿法对桥本甲状腺炎患者血清甲状腺球蛋白抗体、甲状腺过氧化物酶抗体的影响[J].中医杂志,2007,48(5):414-415. 被引量:40
  • 3Khati N, Adamson T, Johnson K, et al. Ultrasound of the thyroid and para thyroid glands. Ultr~sound Q, 2003,19(5) : 162-176.
  • 4Deng J, Zhou P, Tian SM, et al. Comparison of diagnostic effica- cy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, acoustic radiation force im- pulse imaging, and their combined use in differentiating focal solidthyroid nodules. PLoS One, 2014,9(3):e90674.
  • 5Cantisani V, Consorti F, Guerrisi A, et al. Prospective compar- ative evaluation of quantitative elastosonography. Eur J Radiol, 2013(82) : 1892-1898.
  • 6Nemec U, Nemec SF, Novotny C, et al. Quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound after intravenous administration of a microbubble contrast agent for differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: Assessment of diagnostic accuracy. Eur RadioI, 2012,22(6) : 1357-1365.
  • 7Khati N, Adamson T, Johnson K, et al. Ultrasound of the thy- roid and parathyroid glands. Ultrasound Q, 2003, 19 ( 5 ) : 162 176.
  • 8Chan B, Desser T, Medougall I, et al. Common and uncommon sonographic t'eatures of papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Ultra sound Med, 2003,22(9):1083 1090.
  • 9Frates M, Benson C, Charboneau J, et al. Management of thy- roid nodules detected at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultra- sound Consensus Conference Statement. Ultrasound Q, 2006,22 (18):239-240.
  • 10Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Hocke M, et al. Pitfalls and artefacts using contrast enhanced ultrasound. Z Gastroenterol, 2011,49 (3) :350-356.

引证文献8

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部