摘要
纳入固定矫治恒牙列患者30例,随机分为3组(每组10例):A组西湖非调拌型牙釉质粘接剂,B组3M光固化粘接剂,C组3M化学固化粘接剂。比较3组患者的托槽粘接时间,复诊1、3、6个月托槽的脱落率以及性价比。结果发现3种粘接剂在粘接托槽方面均能达到满意的效果,而西湖非调拌型牙釉质粘接剂性价比相对最高。
30 patients with fix orthodontic treatment were randomly divided into 3 groups （n = 10）. Westlake enamel adhesive resin, 3M light-curing adhesive and chemical-curing adhesive were used in group A, B and C respectively for bracket bonding in orthodontic treatment. The exfoliation rate and the performance price ratio of the brackets were compared 1,3, 6 months after treatment. All of these three kinds of the orthodontic adhesives achieved satisfactory results, while the non-mixing type of the Westlake enamel adhesive resin showed relatively higher ratio of performance to price.
出处
《实用口腔医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2013年第5期743-745,共3页
Journal of Practical Stomatology
关键词
正畸粘接剂
性价比
Orthodontic adhesives
Performance price ratio
