中美教材“指数函数与对数函数”内容的组织与呈现方式比较(续)
摘要
3.2纵向维度本节将通过概念建立、范例、问题和小结四个指标比较PEP和PH教材的呈现方式.
出处
《数学通报》
北大核心
2013年第9期51-55,共5页
Journal of Mathematics(China)
基金
主要国家高中数学教材比较研究,国家社会科学基金“十一五”规划2010年度教育学重点课题,课题批准号:ADA100009
参考文献6
-
1陈月兰.主要国家高中代数教学内容的组织与呈现方式的比较研究[J].中学数学月刊,2011(1):38-39. 被引量:2
-
2Charalambos Y.Charalambous,Seán Delaney,Hui-Yu Hsu and Vilma Mesa.A Comparative Analysis of the Addition and Subtraction of Fractions in Textbooks from Three Countries.Mathematical Thinking and Learning,12:117151,2010.
-
3Yeping Li.An Analysis of Algebra Content,Content Organization and Presentation,and To-Be-Solved Problems in Eighth-Grade Mathematics Textbooks from Hong Kong,China's Mainland,Singapore,and the United States.University of Pittsburgh,1999.
-
4PISA 2009 Assessment Framework Key competencies in reading,mathematics and science[E].http://www.oecd.org/document/44/0,3343,en_2649_35845621_44455276_ 1_ 1_ 1_1,00.html,2010,1.
-
5Novak,D.J.,& Ca(n)as,J.A.(2008).The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them.Retrieved from:http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConcept Maps.pdf.
-
6Son,J.(2005).A comparison of how textbooks teach multiplication of fractions and division of fractions in Korea and in the U.S.In Chick,H.L.& Vincent,J.L.(Eds.).Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.Vol.4,pp.201-208.Melbourne:PME.
二级参考文献4
-
1Charalambos Y. Charalambous, Sedn Delaney, Hui-Yu Hsu and Vilma Mesa. A Comparative Analysis of the Addition and Subtraction of Fractions in Textbooks from Three Countries. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12:117 - 151, 2010.
-
2Yeping Li, A Comparison of Problems That Follow Selected Content Presentations in American and Chinese Mathematics Textbooks ,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 31, No. 2 (Mar., 2000), pp. 234- 241.
-
3Ji-won Son, A comparison of how textbooks teach multiplication of fractions and division of fractions in korea and in the U. S. PME 2009.
-
4ZHU YAN, FAN LIANGHUO, Focus on the representation of problem types in intended curriculum : a comparison of selected mathematics textbooks from China's Mainland and United States. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education(2006)4:609-626.
-
1陈月兰,袁思情,谢珺,赵纪诺.中美教材“指数函数与对数函数”内容的组织与呈现方式比较[J].数学通报,2013,52(8):11-16. 被引量:6
-
2常晓慧,侯恕,陈荣环.中美两套高中物理教材中“物理工具”内容的比较研究[J].物理教师,2016,37(11):73-75. 被引量:1
-
3郎晓红.中美高中物理教材比较[J].新课程学习,2015,0(11):24-24. 被引量:2
-
4孙亮.Search for new physics in the B→K^((*))l^+l^- decays at BABAR[J].Chinese Physics C,2010,34(9):1504-1507.
-
5叶珂,胡典顺.PEP与MAC教材中数学探究的比较——基于初中“图形与几何”内容[J].数学通报,2017,56(2):5-10. 被引量:7
-
6李庆.高等代数教学的一点体会[J].数学学习与研究,2012(23):18-18.
-
7陈梅.提高初中数学作业批改有效性的策略研究[J].数学之友,2017,31(8):62-63. 被引量:2
-
8胡立新,邓懿,李昕娟.PEPS系统智能钥匙三维天线场强标定[J].信息通信,2015,28(3):1-2.
-
9王慧,曾诚.中美物理教材中运动学习题对比研究[J].物理教师,2015,36(3):67-68. 被引量:2
-
10袁博,张磊.中美教材科学方法教育的比较研究及启示[J].物理通报,2011,40(5):89-93. 被引量:3