期刊文献+

运行模式对AMBR处理高浓度污水的影响 被引量:1

Influence of Hydraulic Operation Modes on Removal Effect of High- concentration Sewage in AMBR
原文传递
导出
摘要 采用AMBR处理模拟高浓度污水(COD=3 000 mg/L),分别采用"8+4"、"7+5"、"9+3"3种进水模式,每种进水模式下均设置3种水力停留时间(24、16、12 h),考察不同运行模式对AMBR处理效果的影响。结果表明,当进水模式为"8+4"、水力停留时间为24 h时,AMBR对污水的处理效果最好,对COD的平均去除率为88%,出水SS平均为0.15 mg/L,出水pH值在7.0左右。在"9+3"进水模式下,反应器两端格室没有足够的缓冲时间来降解有机物;在"7+5"进水模式下,缓冲阶段大量有机质进入中间格室,导致后面格室的处理负荷增大。 Anaerobic migrating blanket reactor (AMBR) was used to treat synthetic high-concen- tration sewage (COD =3 000 mg/L). Three kinds of influent modes ("8 +4" ,"7 +5" and "9 +3") were adopted, and each mode was accompanied by hydraulic retention times (HRT) of 24 h, 16 h and 12 h. The influence of different operation modes on treatment efficiency of AMBR was investigated. The results showed that under the "8 + 4" mode and HRT of 24 h, the best treatment efficiency of AMBR was achieved with an average COD removal rate of 88%, an average effluent SS of 0.15 mg/L and an effluent pH of about 7.0. There was not enough buffer time for degrading organic matter in the compartments at both sides of the reactor under the "9 + 3" mode. In buffer stage of the "7 + 5" mode a lot of organic matter flowed into the middle compartments, which increased the treatment load in the following compartments.
出处 《中国给水排水》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第19期97-100,共4页 China Water & Wastewater
基金 广东省科技计划项目(2010B031800009)
关键词 AMBR 高浓度污水 水力运行模式 有机污染物 anaerobic migrating blanket reactor AMBR) high concentration sewage hydraulic operation mode organic pollutant
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Angenent L T, Sung S. Development of anaerobic migra- ting blanket reactor (AMBR), a novel anaerobic treat- ment system [ J ]. Water Res, 2001,35 ( 7 ) : 1739 - 1747.
  • 2Angenent L, Abel S, Sung S. Effect of an organic shock load on the stability of an anaerobic migrating blanket re- actor[ J]. J Environ Eng,2002,128 ( 12 ) : 1109 - 1120.
  • 3Angenent L T,Zheng D,Sung S,et al. Microbial commu- nity structure and activity in a compartmentalized, anaero- bic bioreaetor [ J ]. Water Environ Res,2002,74 ( 5 ) :450 -461.
  • 4Kuscu 0 S, Sponza D T. Effects of hydraulic retention time (HRT) and sludge retention time (SRT) on the treatment of nitrobenzene in AMBR/CSTR reactor systems [ J ]. Environ Techno1,2007,28 ( 3 ) : 285 - 296.
  • 5王淑莹,王晓莲,李探微.新型高效厌氧反应器的研究与开发[J].北京工业大学学报,2005,31(6):608-612. 被引量:8
  • 6王薇,吴立波,于海波,李艳玲.厌氧迁移式污泥床反应器的水力特性研究[J].环境工程,2009,27(3):3-6. 被引量:6

二级参考文献21

  • 1Lettinga G. Advanced anaerobic wastewater treatment in near future [J] .Water Sci Tech, 1997,35(10):5-12.
  • 2Dague. Anaerobic migrating blanket reactor: United States, 5885460 [ P]. 1999.
  • 3Largus T A, Gouranga C B. Anaerobic migrating blanket reactor treatment of low-strength wastewater [ J ]. Water Environment Research, 2001,73(5) :567-574.
  • 4Largus T A, Sung Shihwu. Developmeng of anaerobic migrating blanket reactor (AMBR), a novel anaerobic treatment system [ J ]. Water Research, 2001,35(7) : 1739-1747.
  • 5罗固源.水污染物化控制工程[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社,1995:44-52.
  • 6沈耀良.废水生物处理新技术[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1999..
  • 7ANGENENT L T. Development of a new high-rate anaerobic process for the treatment of industrial and domestic wastewater:The anaerobic migrating blanket reactor (AMBR) [D]: [dissertation]. Iowa, US: Iowa State University Ames, 1998.3-19.
  • 8LETTINGA G. Anaerobic digestion and wastewater treatment system [J]. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1995, 67(1): 3-28.
  • 9RE斯皮斯.工业废水的厌氧生物技术[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001.75-80.
  • 10HULSHOFF P L, EULER H, EITNER A, et al. GTZ sectoral project promotion of anaerobic technology for the treatment of municipal and industrial sewage and wastes [A]. 8th international conference on anaerobic digestion [C]. London, UK:IWA Publishing, 1997, 2: 285-293.

共引文献10

同被引文献13

  • 1王淑莹,王晓莲,李探微.新型高效厌氧反应器的研究与开发[J].北京工业大学学报,2005,31(6):608-612. 被引量:8
  • 2Angenent L T, Dague R R. Initial studies on the anaerobic migra-ting blanket reactorproceedings of 51st Purdue Industrial Con -ference[C]. Michigan: Industrial Waste Conference, 1997. 271-288.
  • 3Angenent Largus T , Sung Shihwu. Development of anaerobic migra-ting blanket reactor (AMBR) : a novel anaerobic treatment system[J]. Water Research, 2001,35(7): 1739-1747.
  • 4Dague R R,Angenent L T. Anaerobic migrating blanket reactor[P]. United States: 5 885 460,1999-03-23.
  • 5Angenent L T, Abel J, Sung S. Effect of an organic shock load onthe stability of an anaerobic migrating blanket reactor [J]. Journalof Environmental Engineering,2002,128( 12) : 1109-1120.
  • 6Angenent Largus T, Banik Gouranga C, Sung Shihwu. Anaero-bicmigrating blanket reactor treatment of low-strength wastewater atlow temperatures [J]. Water Environment Research, 2001, 73(5): 567-574.
  • 7Angenent LT,Zheng D, Sung S, et al. Methanosaeta fibers inanaerobic migrating blanket reactors [J]. Water Science andTechnology, 2000, 41(4-5): 35-39.
  • 8Angenent Largus T, Sung Shihwu, Lutgarde Raskin. Formation ofgranules and Methanosaeta fibres in an anaerobic migrating blanketreactor(AMBR) [J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2004, 6(4):315-322.
  • 9Angenent Largus T, Zheng Dandan, Sung Shihwu, et cd. Micro-bial community structure and activity in a compartmentalized,anaerobic bioreactor [J]. Water Environment Research, 2002, 74(5): 450-461.
  • 100 S Ku§9u , SponzaDT. Effects of hydraulic retention time(HRT)and sludge retention time (SRT) on the treatment of nitrobenzene inAMBR/CSTR reactor systems [J]. Environmental Technology,2007, 28(3): 285-296.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部