期刊文献+

BIT和FTA框架下环境规则的经验研究——基于文本的分析 被引量:7

An Empirical Study on Environmental Rules under the Framework of BITs and FTAs Based on the Analysis of the Texts
原文传递
导出
摘要 在现代BIT和包含投资规则的FTA中加入环境规则成为一种普遍现象。BIT和FTA文本在环境条款的表现形式上日益丰富,"非排除措施"条款、平衡条款、除外条款、冲突条款、程序条款等类型不断涌现。美国2012年BIT范本细化并强化了东道国的环境规制权,为各国修订BIT树立了典范。纵观BIT和FTA中环境条款的发展态势,在立法模式上其经历了从双边投资协定向自由贸易协定的演化,在内容和架构上历经了从一元向多元、从分散到集中的演变,在定位上则实现了从完全附属到去边缘化的突破。 It is a common way to embody environmental clauses into modern BITs and FTAs containing investment rules. Such forms of environment clauses as "non-precluded measures" clauses, balancing clauses, carve-out clauses, conflict clauses and procedural clauses in the texts of BITs and FTAs have been emerging, and are increasingly abundant. The 2012 U.S. version of BIT, which has refined and strengthened the environmental regulation power of the host country, sets a good example for other countries to revise their own BITs. Through analyzing the development trend of environmental clauses in BITs and FTAs, the paper concludes that environmental clauses have experienced the evolution from bilateral investment treaties to free trade agreements in terms of the legislative mode, and as to the content and structure, they have experienced the development from unitary to diversity, and from decentralization to centralization. Finally, with regard to the positioning, a breakthrough has happened from complete subsidiary to de-marginalization.
作者 赵玉意
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第9期93-106,共14页 International Economics and Trade Research
关键词 BIT FTA 环境规则 经验 BIT FFA environment rules empirical study
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1UNCTAD:World Investment Report 2012.Chapter IV.
  • 2UNCTAD :World Investment Report 2012. Chapter IV.
  • 3US Model BIT 2004.
  • 4United States-Morocco FTA (2004), Japan-Mexico EPA (2004), Australia-Chile FTA (2008), Peru-Singapore FFA (2008).
  • 5Russian Federation-Sweden BIT(1995).
  • 6Report of the Subconunittee on Investment of the Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy Regarding the Model Bilateral Investment Treaty:Annex,September 30, 2009,at: http://www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/othr/2009/ 131118,htm#1.2013-5-6.
  • 7Belgium/Luxembourg-Mauritius BIT ( 2005 ), Belgium/Luxembourg-Colombia BIT(2009 ), Belgium/Luxembourg- Libya BIT (2004), Belgium/Luxembourg-Panama BIT (2009), Belgium/Luxembourg-United Arab Emirates BIT (2004), Belgium/Luxembourg-Barbados BIT(2009), Belgium/Luxembourg-Tajikistan BIT(2009), Belgium/ Luxembourg-Ethiopia BIT (2006), Belgium/Luxembourg-Nicaragua BIT (2005), Belgium/Luxembourg-Serbia BIT ( 2004 ),Belgium/Luxembourg-Sudan BIT (2005).
  • 8Canada-Czech Republic BIT ( 1990 ), Canada-Romania BIT ( 1996),Canada-Jordan BIT ( 2009 ) ,Canada-Latvia BIT (2009),Canada-Peru (2006), United States-Uruguay BIT ( 2005 ) ,United States-Rwanda BIT (2008), US Model BIT (2004).
  • 9Belgium/Luxembourg-Mauritius BIT(2005) BIT ( 2009 ), Belgium/Luxembourg- Libya BIT (2004), Belgium/Luxembourg-Panama BIT (2009), Belgium/Luxembourg-United Arab Emirates BIT (2004), Belgium/Luxembourg-Barbados BIT(2009), Belgium/Luxembourg-Tajikistan BIT(2009), Belgium/ Luxembourg-Ethiopia BIT (2006), Belgium/Luxembourg-Nicaragua BIT (2005), Belgium/Luxembourg-Serbia BIT(2004), Belgium/Luxembourg-Sudan BIT (2005).
  • 10Costa Rica-Netherlands BIT(1999).

二级参考文献104

  • 1房秋实.浅析网络虚拟财产[J].法学评论,2006,24(2):73-77. 被引量:58
  • 2蔡从燕.效果标准与目的标准之争:间接征收认定的新发展[J].西南政法大学学报,2006,8(6):85-91. 被引量:25
  • 3张乃根.试析《国家责任条款》的“国际不法行为”[J].法学家,2007(3):95-101. 被引量:20
  • 4Article 2(c) of the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1974.
  • 5OECD Working Papers on International Investment No. 2004/4, "Indirect Expropriation" and "The Right to Regulate" in International Investment Law, footnote 1, September 2004.
  • 6Rudolf Dolzer, “Indirect Expropriations: New Developments?” 11 N. Y. U. Environmental L. J. 66.
  • 7William Michael Treanor, "The Original Understanding of the Takings Clause and the Political Process," 95 Colum. L. Rev. 782 (1995).
  • 8William Michael Treanor, "The Origins and Original Significance of the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment," 94 Yale L. J. 694.
  • 9National Mut. Ins. Co. v. Tidewater Transfer Co., 337 U.S. 582 (1949).
  • 10Charles A. Reich, "The New Property", 73 Yale L. J. 733.

共引文献94

同被引文献82

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部