期刊文献+

物流联盟协同创新的两阶段动态激励模型 被引量:3

Two-stage dynamic incentive model of synergy and innovation for logistics alliance
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了提高物流联盟的协同水平与收入状况,以盟主(第三方物流)的收入为目标函数,以盟员的激励相容和保留收入为约束条件,建立了物流联盟协同创新的两阶段动态激励模型。当协同和创新2项任务成本的可替代程度变化时,计算了最优激励系数与最优努力水平,并比较了单期静态与两阶段动态激励下盟员的固定收入与盟主的收入。分析结果表明:当盟员的保留收入为60万元,可替代程度分别为0.2、0.3、0.4、0.5、0.6、0.7时,单期静态激励下盟员的固定收入分别为-108.77、-109.53、-108.48、-106.30、-103.34、-99.93万元,两阶段动态激励下盟员的固定收入分别为-123.67、-110.65、-99.51、-89.83、-81.62、-74.47万元;单期静态激励下盟主的收入分别为109.22、110.09、109.11、106.95、103.95、100.32万元,两阶段动态激励下盟主的收入分别为124.54、111.72、100.73、91.18、82.81、75.30万元,增加比例分别为14.03%、1.48%、-7.68%、-14.75%、-20.34%、-24.94%。盟员的固定收入、最优激励系数与最优努力水平均随可替代程度增大而增大,当可替代程度为0.2时,盟主获得的收入最大,方案最优。 In order to improve the synergy level and income status of logistics alliance, the income of third party logistics (TPL) was taken as objective function, the incentive compatibility constraint and retained income of member were taken as constraint conditions, and the two-stage dynamic incentive model of synergy and innovation for logistics alliance was established. With the change of substitutable degree for the two tasks such as synergy and innovation, the optimal incentive coefficient and the optimal effort level were calculated, and the fixed incomes of member and the incomes of TPL under the single stage static incentive and the two-stage dynamic incomes of TPL are 1.092 2, 1.100 9, 1.091 1, 1.069 5, 1.039 5, 1.003 2 million yuan respectively under the single-stage static incentive and are 1. 245 4, 1. 117 2, 1. 007 3, 0. 911 8, 0. 828 1, 0. 753 0 million yuan respectively under the two-stage dynamic incentive, the incomes of TPL increase 14.03%, 1.48%, -7.68%, -14.75%, -20.34%, -24.94% respectively. The fixed income of member, the optimal incentive coefficient and the optimal effort level increase with the increase of substitutable degree. When substitutable degree is 0.2, the income of TPL is maximum, and the scheme is optimal. 3 tabs, 3 figs, 22 refs.
出处 《交通运输工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期94-101,共8页 Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70932005)
关键词 物流工程 物流联盟 协同创新 收入共享 激励系数 努力水平 委托代理 logistics engineering logistics alliance synergy and innovation income sharing incentive coefficient effort level principal agent
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1HELMI B R, LAURE M G, VINCENT B, et al. Measuring innovation best practices: improvement of an innovation index integrating threshold and synergy effects [J ]. Technovation,1008, 28(12): 838 -854.
  • 2龙跃,易树平.两阶段决策下物流任务联盟协同管理优化[J].计算机集成制造系统,2010,16(4):802-809. 被引量:13
  • 3唐建民.盟主型物流联盟协同管理公共因子分析[J].科技管理研究,2010,30(17):238-241. 被引量:2
  • 4郭焱,张世英,郭彬,冷永刚.战略联盟伙伴选择的契约机制研究[J].系统工程学报,2004,19(5):477-481. 被引量:13
  • 5BENGT H, PAUL M. Multi-task principal-agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership and job design[J]. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 1991, 7(2): 24-52.
  • 6CLARKE F H, DARROUGH M N. Optimal employment contracts in a principal-agent relationship [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1983, 4(2/3): 69-90.
  • 7GIBBONS R, MURPHY K J. Optimal incentive contracts in the presence of career concerns: theory and evidence [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1992, 100(3) : 468-505.
  • 8陈安,刘鲁,李刚,陈宁.虚拟企业协作博弈中的双优策略[J].系统工程理论与实践,2000,20(8):12-17. 被引量:15
  • 9RAFFI I, DHANANJAY N. Dynamic incentives and respon- sibility accounting[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1999, 27(2): 177-201.
  • 10BENGT H. Managerial incentive problems: a dynamic per- spective[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1999, 66(1) : 169- 182.

二级参考文献125

共引文献225

同被引文献27

  • 1张清辉.合作创新风险研究综述[J].工业技术经济,2005,24(1):57-59. 被引量:18
  • 2姜伟.虚拟物流联盟核心能力分析[J].科技创业月刊,2007,20(8):65-67. 被引量:3
  • 3Indjejikian R, Nanda D. Dynamic incentives and responsibility accounting[ J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1999,27(2) : 177-201.
  • 4Tsai K H. Collaborative networks and product innovation performance : Toward a contingency perspective [ J ]. ResearchPolicy, 2009,38(5) : 765-778.
  • 5Mukhopadhyay S K, Setoputro R. Optimal return policy and modular design for build-to-order products [ J ]. Journal ofOperations Management, 2005,23(5) : 496-506.
  • 6Razak A A, Saad M. The role of universities in the evolution of the triple helix culture of innovation network: the case ofmalaysia[ J]. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 2007 , 6(3) : 211-225.
  • 7Hess S, Suhrbeer S, Siegwart R Y. The Impact of collaborative innovation between established industry and academictechnology spin-offs[ J]. Business and Management Research, 2013,2(3) : 1.
  • 8Ahrweiler P, Keane M T. Innovation networks[ J]. Mind & Society, 2013 : 1-18.
  • 9吴冰,刘义理,赵林度.供应链协同知识创新的激励设计[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,29(7):120-124. 被引量:19
  • 10彭本红,周叶.企业协同创新中机会主义行为的动态博弈与防范对策[J].管理评论,2008,20(9):3-8. 被引量:40

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部