期刊文献+

呼气末正压通气对小儿麻醉诱导期无通气时限的影响及其与年龄和体重的相关性 被引量:1

Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on duration of nonhypoxic apnea during induction of pediatric general anesthesia and its correlation with age and weight
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨呼气末正压通气(PEEP)能否延长小儿全身麻醉诱导期无通气时限,及其与年龄、体重的相关性。方法 40例1~8岁,美国麻醉医师学会分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,拟在全身麻醉下行择期手术的患儿,随机分入PEEP组和对照组。静脉注射丙泊酚、芬太尼和罗库溴铵行麻醉诱导,小儿自主呼吸减弱后面罩给氧并给予压力控制模式(PSV)机械辅助通气,设定吸气压力15cmH2O(1cmH2O=0.098kPa),根据患儿年龄调整呼吸频率,其中PEEP组在对照组的基础上加用6cmH2O的PEEP。两组患儿的机械通气时间均为3min。记录机械辅助通气停止至脉搏血氧饱和度(Sp O2)降至99%(t99)、95%(t95)和90%的时间(t90),采用线性回归分析两组小儿无通气时限(即t90)与年龄及体重的相关性。结果两组间t99、t95和t90的差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05),对照组患儿的年龄、体重与无通气时限的线性拟合良好,R2值分别为0.895和0.878;PEEP组患儿相应的拟合度降低,R2值分别为0.604和0.412。PEEP组的年龄、体重与无通气时限的相关系数分别为0.771、0.642,均显著低于对照组的0.946、0.937(P值均<0.05)。结论 PEEP不能显著延长1~8岁小儿全身麻醉诱导期无通气时限,但可以减少年龄和体重对无通气时限的影响。 Objective To investigate whether positive end-expiratory airway pressure (PEEP) during anesthesia induction increases duration of nonhypoxic apnea and its correlation with age and weight in pediatric patients. Methods Forty children, aged 1 to 8 years old, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I - Ⅱ , were scheduled for elective surgery and randomly divided into PEEP group and control group. General anesthesia was induced with propofol, fentanil and rocuronium. After spontaneously breathing weakened, assisted mechanical ventilation was performed under pressure controlled pattern for 3 min until tracheal intubation. The inspiratory pressure was 15 cmHzO (1 cmH20 = 0. 098 kPa). PEEP (6 cmH20) was applied in the PEEP group additionally. Apnea duration was recorded when saturation of blood oxygen (SpO2) reached 99% (t99), 95% ( t95 ) and 90 % ( t90 ). The correlation between the nonhypoxic apnea duration ( t90 ), age and weight was analyzed by linear regression. Results There was no significant difference in t99, t95 and t90 between the two groups (all P〉0.05). The result of linear regression showed that in the control group R2 values of nonhypoxia apnea duration with children's age and weight were 0. 895 and 0. 878, respectively, while they were 0. 604 and 0. 412 in the PEEP group. The coefficients of correlation of age and weight with nonhypoxia apnea duration in the PEEP group were 0.771 and 0.642, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the control group (0. 946 and 0.937, both P〈0.05). Conclusion PEEP during induction of general anesthesia will not increase nonhypoxic apnea duration in children of 1 to 8 years old. However, it can reduce the effect of age and weight on nonhypoxic apnea duration. (Shanghai Med J, 2013, 36.. 683-686)
出处 《上海医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第8期683-686,共4页 Shanghai Medical Journal
关键词 无通气时限 小儿 呼气末正压通气 Nonhypoxic apnea duration Pediatric Positive end-expiratory pressure
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1HERRIGER A, FRASCAROLO P, SPAHN D R, et al. The effect of positive airway pressure during preoxygenation and induction of anaesthesia upon duration of non-hypoxic apnoea[J]. Anaesthesia, 2004, 59 (3): 243-247.
  • 2GANDER S, FRASCAROLO P, SUTER M, et al. Positive end-expiratory pressure during induction of general anesthesia increases duration of nonhypoxic apnea in morbidly obese patients[J]. Anesth Analg, 2005, 100 (2) : 580-584.
  • 3NEUMANN P, ROTHEN H U, BERGLUND J E, et al. Positive end-expiratory pressure prevents atelectasis during general anaesthesia even in the presence of a high inspired oxygen concentration [J]. Aeta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1999, 43(3) : 295-301.
  • 4RUSCA M, PROIETTI S, SCHNYDER P, et al. Prevention of atelectasis formation during induction of general anesthesia[J]. Anesth Analg, 2003, 97 (6) : 1835-1839.
  • 5COUSSA M, PROIETTI S, SCHNYDER P, et al. Prevention of atelectasis formation during the induction of general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients[J]. Anesth Analg, 2004, 98(5): 1491-1495.
  • 6BUTLER P J, MUNRO H M, KENNY M B. Preoxygenation in children using expired oxygraphy[J]. Br J Anaesth, 1996, 77(3).. 333-334.
  • 7MACHLIN H A, MYLES P S, BERRY C B, et al. Endtidal oxygen measurement compared with patient factor assessment for determining preoxygenation time [ J ]. Anaesth Intensive Care, 1993, 21(4): 409-413.
  • 8THORSTEINSSON A, JONMARKER C, LARSSON A, et al. Functional residual capacity in anesthetized children: normal values and values in children with cardiac anomalies [J]. Anesthesiology, 1990, 73(5): 876-881.
  • 9LINDAHL S G. Oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide elimination in infants and children during anaesthesia and surgery[J]. BrJ Anaesth, 1989, 62(1): 70-76.
  • 10MOTOYAMA E K. Effects of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) on respiratory mechanics and oxygen saturation (SpO2) in infants and children under general anesthesia[J]. Anesthesiology, 1996, 85:A1099.

二级参考文献5

  • 1王强,陈绍洋,朱萧玲,熊东方,杨丽芳,熊利泽.全麻诱导期呼气末正压通气对老年患者无通气期的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(8):566-568. 被引量:7
  • 2Jones RL, Nzekwu MM. The effects of body mass index on lung volumes. Chest, 2006,130 : 827-833.
  • 3Dixon BJ, Dixon JB, Carden JR, et al. Preoxygenation is more effective in the 25 degrees head-up position than in the supine position in severely obese patients: a randomized controlled study. Anesthesiology, 2005,102 : 1110-1115.
  • 4Leftheriotis G, Preckel MP, Fizanne L, et al. Effect of headupright tilt on the dynamic of cerebral autoregulation. Clin Physiol, 1998,18: 41-47.
  • 5Harms MP, van Lieshout J J, Jenstrup M, et al. Postural effects on cardiac output and mixed venous oxygen saturation in humans. Exp Physiol, 2003,88 : 611-616.

共引文献20

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部