期刊文献+

自愿性环境政策工具与管制压力的关系——来自经济模型的验证 被引量:8

Voluntary Environmental Policy Approaches and Regulation Pressure: A Simple Economic Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 自愿性环境政策工具是企业与管制机构博弈的结果,管制压力是影响该工具制定与效果的关键因素,那么,管制压力是如何影响自愿性工具呢?为了解释管制压力对自愿性环境协议的影响过程,文章建构了一个简单的经济模型,验证管制压力与自愿性协议的关系。研究表明:第一,管制压力是企业决定是否参加自愿性协议的主要因素;第二,自愿性协议中所确定的自愿削减量是管制机构与企业博弈均衡的结果,均衡结果有可能是最优自愿削减量,该削减量大于管制工具所强加的最优削减量,但是最优自愿削减量的产生依赖于强的管制压力。 Voluntary environmental policy tools are the result of the game between enterprises and regulatory agencies. Regulatory pressure is the key factor affecting the tools. This research focuses on how regulatory pres-sure influences the setting and performance of voluntary tools. In order to answer this question, this study constructs a simple economic model to test the relationship between regulation pressure and voluntary agreements. This model presents two conclusions: firstly, pressure coming from the regulatory agency is the most important factor in enterprises deciding whether to sign voluntary agreements ; second, pollution reduction targets in volun- tary agreements are the resuh of game equilibrium. The equilibrium result may be the optimum voluntary reduc- tion and greater than reductions imposed by regulation tools, but optimal voluntary reduction relies on strong regulatory pressure.
作者 王惠娜
出处 《经济社会体制比较》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期100-108,共9页 Comparative Economic & Social Systems
基金 国家社科项目"基于生态文明建设的流域生态服务供给机制研究"(项目编号:12BKS043) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金"区域公共事务的合作治理研究"(项目编号:12YJC630003)
关键词 自愿性 环境政策工具 管制压力 博弈均衡 Voluntary Environmental Policy Instruments Regulation Press Game
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1节能减排简报[EBJOL].http://www.cecaweb.org.cn/CNJz~y.html.
  • 2Anton, W R Q, Deltas, G and Khanna, M,2004. "Incentives for Environmental Self- regulation and Impli- cations for Environmental Performance. "Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 48:632 -654.
  • 3Arihmura,T H, Hibiki, A and Katayama, H, 2008. "Is a Voluntary Approach an Effective Environmental Policy Instrument? A Case for Environmental Management Systems. " Journal Environmental Economics and Management. 55:281 - 295.
  • 4Borkey,P,Glachant, M and Leveque, F, 1998 . Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policy in OECDCountries : An Assessment. The Report of 14'h Session of WPEEPI.
  • 5Brouhle, K, Griffiths, C and Wolverton, A ,2009. "Evaluating the Role of EPA Policy Levers : An Examina- tion of a Voluntary Program and Regulatory Threat in the Metal -finishing Industry. "Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 57 : 166 - 81.
  • 6Gamper - Rabindran S, 2006. "Did the EPA's Voluntary Industrial Toxics Program Reduce Emissions? AGIS Analysis of Distributional Impacts and By - media Analysis of Substitution. "Journal of Environmental E- conomics and Management. 52:391 -410.
  • 7Henriques, I and Sadorsky, P, 1996. "The Determinants of an Environmentally Responsive Firm: An Em- pirical Approach. "Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 30 : 381 - 95.
  • 8Jordan, A, Wurzel, R and Zito, A R,2003." New" Instruments of Environmental Governance? National Ex- periences and Prospects. London:Frank Cass Publishers.
  • 9Khanna, M and Damon, L A, 1999. "EPA'S Voluntary 33/55 Program : Impact on Toxic Releases and Eco- nomic Performance of Firms. "Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 37 : 1 - 25.
  • 10Segerson, K and Miceli,T J, 1998. "Voluntary Environmental Agreements: Good or Bad News for Environ- mental Protection?" Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 36 : 109 - 30.

同被引文献121

引证文献8

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部