期刊文献+

理解中国政治的概念策略——以《理解中国政治:关键词的方法》为研究样本 被引量:2

Conceptual Strategy for Understanding Chinese Politics——Based on the Study Sample of “Understanding Chinese Politics: the Method of Key Words”
原文传递
导出
摘要 如何概括和指称变迁中的中国政治现象,常常是摆在学者面前的一个挑战。毕竟,概念化谬误不仅会造成理解中国政治的障碍,而且会影响中西政治学之间的对话。文章从概念的命名、抽象、分类以及比较等环节出发,试图建立合理的概念策略:首先,在概念命名环节中应注意内涵与外延的严格对应,以避免概念拉伸的风险;其次,当进行比较研究时,可以采用抽象阶梯的方法——通过抽取、分类出某些共同属性并建立一般概念和中层概念——来更好地理解中国政治的"特殊性"。 It is always a challenge for scholars to summarize and name the changing political issues in China. The fallacies of conceptualization not only present barriers to understanding, but also influence scholars' dialogue. This paper aims to establish a logical conceptual strategy from different aspects, such as naming, abstracting, cataloguing and comparing. Firstly, to avoid conceptual stretching, the connotation of the concept must be strictly correspondent with its denotation; secondly, to better comprehend Chinese politics, the "ladder of abstraction" method to construct general and medium - level concepts will be introduced, by way of abstracting and cataloguing the common essence of different objects.
作者 汪吉庶
出处 《经济社会体制比较》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期206-212,共7页 Comparative Economic & Social Systems
关键词 概念策略 概念旅行 抽象阶梯 萨托利 Conceptual Strategy Conceptual Traveling Ladder of Abstraction Sartori
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1景跃进,张小劲,余逊达主编,2012.《理解中国政治:关键词的方法》,北京:中国社会科学出版社.
  • 2[英]安德鲁·海伍德.《政治学核心概念》,吴勇译,天津:天津人民出版社2008年版,第34页.
  • 3[德]马克斯·韦伯.《经济与社会》,北京:商务印书馆,1997年,第241-252页.
  • 4[美]塞缪尔·亨廷顿,2008.《变化社会的政治秩序》,王冠华等译,上海:上海世纪出版集团.
  • 5Collier,D. and James E. Mahon, JR, 1993. "Conceptual ' stretching' Revisited : Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis. "American Political Science Review. 87 (4).
  • 6Collier, D. and S. Levitsky,2009. "Democracy: Conceptual Hierarchies in Comparative Research. "in D. Collier and J. Gerring, eds. Concepts and Method in Social Science : The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori. Chap IV, London: Routledge.
  • 7Giovanni,Sartori, 1970. " Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. "American Political Science Re- view. 64(4).
  • 8Giovanni,Sartori,1991. "Comparing and Miscomparing. "Journal of Theoretical Politics. 3 ( 3 ).
  • 9Giovanni,Sartori,2009. "Guidelines for Concept Analysis. "in D. Collier and J. Gerring, eds. Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori. Chap IV, London: Routledge.
  • 10Gallie,WB. ,1956. Essentially Contested Concepts, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. London:Wiley.

共引文献6

同被引文献24

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部