期刊文献+

可溶性髓样细胞触发受体1、脂多糖连接蛋白在新生儿严重细菌感染诊断中的价值 被引量:2

The diagnostic value of soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 and lipopolysaccharide binding protein in neonatal serious bacterial infections
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨可溶性髓样细胞触发受体1(sTREM-1)、脂多糖连接蛋白(LBP)在诊断新生儿严重细菌感染中的价值。方法共171例新生儿纳入研究,根据临床表现、实验室检查和发病时间分为感染组(包括早发感染和晚发感染)及非感染组;检测两组新生儿血清sTREM-1、LBP、CRP水平,并绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),计算曲线下面积(AUC),评估各项指标对新生儿严重细菌感染的诊断价值。结果感染组新生儿sTREM-1、LBP水平明显升高,与非感染组的差异有统计学意义(P=0.000)。在诊断新生儿早发严重感染中,sTREM-1的AUC(0.888)最高,LBP(0.839)次之,CRP(0.706)最低;而在诊断新生儿晚发严重感染中,LBP的AUC(0.865)最高,sTREM-1(0.860)次之,CRP(0.705)最低。结论 sTREM-1、LBP在新生儿严重细菌感染诊断中具有一定价值。 Objective To evaluate the accuracy of the soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (sTREM-1) and lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) as diagnostic indices for neonatal serious bacterial infections (SBI). Methods A total of 171 newborns were enrolled in the study, and were classified into SBI group (including early-onset and late-onset), non-SBI group according to clinical manifestations, laboratory examinations and the time of disease onset. Serum sTREM-1, LBP and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) was drawn, and the area under curve (AUC) was calculated. Each index was evaluated for the diagnostic value of neonatal SBI. Results The sTREM-1 and LBP levels were significantly higher in SBI group than those in non-SBI group (P=0.000). The AUC of ROC for sTREM-1, LBP and CRP in early-onset SBI was 0.888, 0.839 and 0.706, respectively. The AUC of ROC for sTREM-1, LBP and CRP in late-onset SBI was 0.860, 0.865 and 0.705, respectively. Conclusions Both sTREM-1 and LBP are useful for the diag-nosis of neonatal SBI.
作者 林燕 熊英
出处 《临床儿科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第9期812-816,共5页 Journal of Clinical Pediatrics
基金 新生儿科国家临床重点专科建设项目
关键词 细菌感染 可溶性髓样细胞触发受体1 脂多糖结合蛋白 C反应蛋白 新生儿 bacterial infection soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-l lipopolysaccharidebinding protein C-reactive protein newborn
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Gibot S, Cravoisy A. Soluble form of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 as a marker of microbial infection [J]. Clin Med Res,2004,2(3): 181-187.
  • 2Pavcnik-Arnol M, Hojker S, Derganc M. Lipopolysaccha- ride binding protein in critically ill neonates and children with suspected infection, comparison with procalcitonin, interleu- kin-6, and C-reactive protein [J]. Intensive Care Med,2004, 30(7): 1454-1460.
  • 3Gerdes JS. Diagnosis and management of bacterial infections in the neonate [J]. Pediatr Clin North Am, 2004, 51(4): 939-959.
  • 4Cetinkaya M, Ozkan H, K6ksal N, et al. Comparison of se- rum amyloid A concentrations with those of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in diagnosis and follow-up of neonatal sepsis in premature infants [J]. J Perinatol, 2009, 29(3): 225-231.
  • 5KOksal N, Harmanci R, Cetinkaya M, et al. Role ofprocal- citonin and CRP in diagnosis and follow-up of neonatal sepsis [J]. Turk J Pediatr, 2007, 49(1): 21-29.
  • 6Orlikowsky TW, Trfig C, Neunhoeft:r F, et al. Lipopolysac- charide-binding protein in nonint:cted neonates and those with suspected early-onset bacterial infection [J]. J Perinatol, 2006, 26(2): 115-119.
  • 7Rubin LG, Sfinchez PJ, Siegel J, et al. Evaluation and treat- ment of neonates with suspected late-onset sepsis:a survey of neonatologists' practices [J]. Pediatrics, 2002, 110(4): e42.
  • 8Caldas JP, Marba ST, Blotta MH, et al. Accuracy of white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha for diagnosing late neonatal sepsis [J]. J Pediatr (Rio J), 2008,84(6):536-542.
  • 9Ng PC, Lam HS. Diagnostic markers forneonatal sepsis [J]. Curr Opin Pediatr, 2006,18(2): 125-131.
  • 10Sakr Y, Burgett U, Nacul FE, et al. Lipopolysaccharide binding protein in a surgical intensive care unit: a marker of sepsis? [J]. Crit Care Med, 2008,36(7): 2014-2022.

同被引文献22

  • 1徐德斌,钱桂生,侯一峰,赵晓利,陈维中,李淑萍.噬菌体展示短肽模拟脂多糖结合蛋白抗炎功能位点的研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2004,26(7):573-575. 被引量:6
  • 2黄谱,苟文丽.未足月胎膜早破的促胎肺成熟治疗[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2006,22(6):409-411. 被引量:52
  • 3Gibot S, Cravoisy A, Levy B, et al. Soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells and the diagnosis of pneumonia [J]. N Engl J Med, 2004, 350(5) : 451-458.
  • 4Ye W, Hu Y, Zhang R, et al. Diagnostic value of the soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 in lower respiratory tract infections: a meta-analysis [J]. Res- pirology, 2014, 19(4): 501-507.
  • 5Ford JW, McVicar DW. TREM and TREM-like receptors in inflammation and disease [J]. Curr Opin Immunol, 2009, 21(1): 38-46.
  • 6Bouehon A, Facchetti F, Weigand MA, et al. TREM- 1 amplifies inflammation and is a crucial mediator of septic shock [J]. Nature, 2001, 410(6832): 1103-1107.
  • 7Oku R, Oda S, Nakada TA, et al. Differential pattern of cell-surface and soluble TREM-1 between sepsis and SIRS [J].Cytokine, 2013, 61(1): 112-117.
  • 8Palazzo S J, Simpson TA, Simmons JM, et al. Soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-l(sTREM-1) as a diagnostic marker of ventilator-associated pneumonia [J]. Respir Care, 2012, 57(12): 2052-2058.
  • 9Schultz MJ, Determann RM. PCT and sTREM-I .. the markers of infection in critically ill patients? [J]. Med Sci Monit, 2008, 14(12).. RA241-RA247.
  • 10Don M, Valent F, Korppi M, et al. Differentiation of bac- terial and viral community-acquired pneumonia in children [J].Pediatrlnt, 2009, 51(1): 91-96.

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部