期刊文献+

Development of a skill assessment tool for the Korea operational oceanographic system 被引量:1

Development of a skill assessment tool for the Korea operational oceanographic system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 A standard skill assessment (SA) tool was developed and implemented to evaluate the performance of op- erational forecast models in the Korea operational oceanographic system. The SA tool provided a robust way to assess model skill in the system by comparing predictions and observations, and involved the com- putation of multiple skill metrics including correlation and error skills. User- and system-based acceptance criteria of skill metrics were applied to determine whether predictions were acceptable for the system. To achieve this, the tool produced a time series comparison plot, a skill score table, and an advanced sum- marized diagram to effectively demonstrate the multiple skill scores. Moreover, the SA was conducted to evaluate both atmospheric and hydrodynamic forecast variables. For the atmospheric variables, acceptable error criteria were preferable to acceptable correlation criteria over short timescales, since the mean square error overwhelmed the observation variance. Conversely, for the hydrodynamic variables, acceptable root mean square percentage error (e.g., perms) criteria were preferable to acceptable error (e.g., erms) criteria owing to the spatially variable tidal intensity around the Korean Peninsula. Furthermore, the SA indicated that predetermined acceptance error criteria were appropriate to satisfy a target central frequency (fc) for which errors fell within the specified limits (i.e., the .fc equals 70%). A standard skill assessment (SA) tool was developed and implemented to evaluate the performance of op- erational forecast models in the Korea operational oceanographic system. The SA tool provided a robust way to assess model skill in the system by comparing predictions and observations, and involved the com- putation of multiple skill metrics including correlation and error skills. User- and system-based acceptance criteria of skill metrics were applied to determine whether predictions were acceptable for the system. To achieve this, the tool produced a time series comparison plot, a skill score table, and an advanced sum- marized diagram to effectively demonstrate the multiple skill scores. Moreover, the SA was conducted to evaluate both atmospheric and hydrodynamic forecast variables. For the atmospheric variables, acceptable error criteria were preferable to acceptable correlation criteria over short timescales, since the mean square error overwhelmed the observation variance. Conversely, for the hydrodynamic variables, acceptable root mean square percentage error (e.g., perms) criteria were preferable to acceptable error (e.g., erms) criteria owing to the spatially variable tidal intensity around the Korean Peninsula. Furthermore, the SA indicated that predetermined acceptance error criteria were appropriate to satisfy a target central frequency (fc) for which errors fell within the specified limits (i.e., the .fc equals 70%).
出处 《Acta Oceanologica Sinica》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2013年第9期74-81,共8页 海洋学报(英文版)
基金 The Project"Development of Korea Operational Oceanographic System(PM57041)"funded by the Ministry of Land,Transport and Maritime Affairs of the Korean Government the Project"Cooperation on the Development of Basic Technologies for the Yellow Sea and East China Sea Operational Oceanographic System(YOOS)"funded by the China-Korea Joint Ocean Research Center(CKJORC)
关键词 skill assessment tool operational forecast system Korea operational oceanographic system skill assessment tool, operational forecast system, Korea operational oceanographic system
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Anthes R A, Kuo Y-H, Hsie E-Y, et al. 1989. Estimation of skill and uncertainty in regional numerical models. Q J Roy Meteor Soc, 115:763-806.
  • 2Cancino L, Neves R. 1999. Hydrodynamic and sediment suspension modeling in estuarine systems: Part I. Description of the nu- merical models. J Mar Syst, 22:105-116.
  • 3Chen C, Liu H, Beardsley R C. 2003. An unstructured grid, finite- volume, three-dimensional, primitive equations ocean model: Application to coastal ocean and estuaries. J Atrnos Ocean Tech, 20:159-186.
  • 4Haidvogel D B, Arango H G, Hedstrom K, et al. 2000. Model evaluation experiments in the North Atlantic Basin: Simulations in non- linear terrain-following coordinates. Dynam Atmos Oceans, 32: 239-281.
  • 5Hess K W, Gross T E Schmalz R A, et al. 2003. NOS standards for eval- uating operational nowcast and forecast hydrodynamic model systems. NOAA Tech Rep NOS CS, 17:1-48.
  • 6Jolliff ] K, Kindle ] C, Shulman I, et al. 2009. Summary diagrams for coupled hydrodynamic-ecosystem model skill assessment. JMar Syst, 76:64-82.
  • 7Kim S D, Kim B, Baek S-H. 2011. Data archiving system for the opera- tional ocean forecasting. The Second China-Korea Joint Work- shop on Marine Environmental Forecasting for the Yellow Sea and East China Sea, Vol. 1:85-86.
  • 8Lee J-C, Kwon J-I, Park K-W, et al. 2008. Calculations of storm surges, Typhoon Maemi. J Korean Soc Coast Ocean Eng, 20:93-100.
  • 9Legates D R, McCabe lr G J. 1999. Evaluating the use of "goodness-of- fit" measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour Res, 35(1): 233-241.
  • 10Loague K, Green R E. 1991. Statistical and graphical methods for e- valuating solute transport models: overview and application. J Contam Hydrol, 7:51-73.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部