期刊文献+

法律事实的意义辨析 被引量:33

On the Meaning of Legal Fact in the Civil Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 民法学通常将法律事实作为引致法律关系得丧变更的具体事实。但该定位隐含着表达与所指的错位,并缺失立法视角的审视,其法律意义还容易被常识所覆盖。要修正这些不当,宜从立法视角出发,以规范为定位点,法律事实因此可一般化为与法律效果对应的构成要件,即在特定功能引导下经由专业逻辑安排而形成的格式化社会现实的规范工具,同时又能具体化为构成要件中的构造要素。它们的关系错综而有序,反映了民法的体系性。以规范面目出现的法律事实是法律理念与现实的对应与调适,在适用中还要与个案的具体事实再次对应与调适。法律事实由此充满互动的张力,同时也使民法学有了多元的知识资源。但无论如何,法律事实并非具体事实。 In Chinese civil law theory, legal fact is a special academic concept, and means some con- crete fact which induces the generation, change or end of legal relation. However, this popular recog- nition has fatal defects of misconnecting what it says and what it wants to refer to, lacking the scan from the view of law-making, and making the legal understanding and common sense confused. On the general level, legal fact should be the constitutive condition which is the condition of the legal effect in the integrate rule. In this respect, legal fact is a kind of normative instrument to format social actuality, which is composed in virtue of professional logic arrangement guided by special legal function. So, the well-known divisions of legal fact, such as natural fact and action, legal action and illegal action, juristic action and factual action, do not refer to concrete facts, but refer to concrete rules actually. On the specific level, legal fact should be the constitutive element of the legal condi- tion. In this respect, legal fact has more appearances, such as the outer fact and the inner fact, the positive fact and the passive fact, and the affirmative fact and the possible fact. The relationship of those facts is reticular and orderly, and this complexion reflects the systematization of the civil law. Though legal fact should be normative, it is the parallelism and accommodation between the legal idea and reality. When legal fact is put into practice, it will correspond with and accommodate the concrete fact in the real case. Obviously, legal fact is full of tension between law and life, full of in- teraction between idea and reality, and full of intertwining between rule and case. In view of the meaning of legal fact, civil law theory should have pluralistic resources of knowledge.
作者 常鹏翱
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期3-23,共21页 Chinese Journal of Law
关键词 法律事实 具体事实 抽象事实 构成要件 类型 legal fact, concrete fact, abstract fact, constitutive condition, type
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1苏永钦.《论动产加工的物权与债权效果》,载《私法自治中的经济理论》,中国人民大学出版社2004年版,第269页.
  • 2陈裕琨.分析法学对行为概念的重建[J].法学研究,2003,25(3):14-29. 被引量:26
  • 3陈嘉映.《事物,事实,论证》[A].载赵汀阳主编.《论证》[C].辽海出版社,1999年版.第1页以下.
  • 4王泽鉴.《无效法律行为之撤销》,载王泽鉴.《民法学说与判例研究》第4册,中国政法大学出版社1998年版,第28页.
  • 5刘幸义.《由一般法律学说到刑法构成要件》,《台湾法学杂志》第185期(2011年10月).
  • 6王伯琦.《论概念法学》,载《王伯琦法学论著集》,三民书局,1999年印行,第33-50页.
  • 7梁治平.《解释学法学与法律解释的方法论》,载梁治平主编:《法律解释问题》,法律出版社,1998年版,第93页.
  • 8吴从周.《论法学上之“类型思维”》,载《法理学论丛—纪念杨日然教授》,台湾月旦出版社股份有限公司1997年版,第312页,第308页以下,第315页以下.
  • 9赵汀阳《关于命运的知识》,见赵汀阳主编《现代性与中国》.广东教育出版社2000年版,页753.
  • 10王伯琦.“法学,科学乎?艺术乎?”[A]..《王伯琦法学论著集》[C].三民书局,1999年1月版.第20-21页.

二级参考文献83

  • 1高在敏,陈涛.对民事法律行为本质合法说的质疑[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),1996,18(1):33-37. 被引量:19
  • 2LUO Kun1,2,CHEN ShiLin1,CHEN KeLi2,SONG JingYuan1,YAO Hui1,MA XinYe1,ZHU YingJie3,PANG XiaoHui1,YU Hua1,LI XiWen1,4 & LIU Zhen2 1Institute of Medicinal Plant Development,Peking Union Medical College,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing 100193,China,2College of Pharmacy,Hubei University of Chinese Medicine,Wuhan 430061,China,3School of Bioscience and Engineering,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,China,4Department of Chemistry,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China.Assessment of candidate plant DNA barcodes using the Rutaceae family[J].Science China(Life Sciences),2010,53(6):701-708. 被引量:32
  • 3《比较法研究》(2004)目录索引[J].比较法研究,2004,18(6):158-160. 被引量:2
  • 4[德]迪特尔·梅迪库斯.德国债法分论[M].杜景林,卢谌,译.北京:法律出版社,2007.
  • 5[德]罗森贝克,施瓦布,戈特瓦尔德.德国民事诉讼法[M].李大雪译.北京:中国法制出版社,2007.
  • 6全国人大常委会法制工作委员会民法室.侵权责任法立法背景与观点全集[M].北京:法律出版社,2010:766-769.
  • 7全国人大法工委民法室.《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》条文解释与立法背景[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2010:220.
  • 8最高人民法院侵权责任法研究小组.《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》条文理解与适用[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2010.
  • 9孙宪忠,冯珏.需要什么样的侵权责任法[N].中国社会科学院报,2009-04-07.
  • 10[德]汉斯一约阿希姆·穆泽拉克.德国民事诉讼法基础教程[M].周翠,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005.

共引文献268

同被引文献585

二级引证文献330

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部