摘要
目的 探讨男性服刑人员的自我控制、自动思维和应对方式的特征及相互关系.方法 采用自我控制问卷、自动思维问卷和应对方式问卷对725名男性服刑人员进行调查.结果 (1)高年龄段男性服刑人员的自我控制得分显著高于低年龄段(F=12.063,P<0.000),高学历组男性服刑人员的自我控制得分显著高于低学历组(F=2.990,P=0.030).(2)男性服刑人员的自我控制和应对方式各因子呈显著相关(r=0.203~0.381,P<0.01),低自我控制对应自责、幻想、退避和合理化等不成熟的应对方式,高自我控制对应解决、求助等成熟的应对方式.(3)男性服刑人员的自动思维和应对方式各维度呈显著相关(r=0.085~0.603,P<0.01),负性自动思维者较多使用不成熟应对方式.结论 男性服刑人员常存在低自我控制、易出现负性思维和消极应对方式,三者又相互影响和促进;有必要对自我控制不良和不成熟应对方式的服刑人员给予相应的心理辅导.
Objective To explore the features of male prisoners'self-control,automatic thought and coping style,and the relationship between them.Methods Randomly selected 725 male prisoners tested by Self-control Scale,the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire and Coping-style Inventory.Results (1) High-age male inmates self-control score was significantly higher than the low ages (F =12.063,P 〈 0.01),high-education male inmates self-control score was significantly higher than the low-education ones (F=2.990,P =0.030).(2) The self-control was significantly correlated with all factors of coping style for male inmates(r =0.203-0.381,P 〈 0.01).Low self-control corresponds to immature coping style,high self-control corresponds to mature coping style.(3) Automatic thought was significantly correlated with coping styles of male inmate factors(r=0.085-0.603,P〈0.01).Negative automatic thoughts were more likely to use immature coping style.Conclusions Low self-control and immature coping style may be psychological factors influence crime,if necessary,give appropriate counseling of poor self-control and immature coping styles inmates.
出处
《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2013年第8期743-746,共4页
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science