期刊文献+

自知力评定量表中文版的信效度研究 被引量:11

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the schedule for assessment of insight
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨自知力评定量表(SAI)中文版的信度和效度.方法 将原版量表进行翻译、回译,形成SAI中文版,对220例符合精神障碍诊断和统计手册第四版(DSM-Ⅳ)精神分裂症、精神分裂症样障碍、分裂情感性精神障碍、妄想性精神障碍、短暂精神病性障碍诊断标准的患者进行了施测,并做信度和效度检验.结果 总量表的标准化Cronbach'sα系数为0.890,重测信度为0.742,评估者间一致性为0.986.该量表包含三个分量表:疾病意识、精神症状标识及治疗依从性.各条目对因子的负荷系数为0.883 ~0.944.总量表及三个分量表与PANSS自知力评分的相关系数分别为-0.635,-0.305,-0.631及-0.512(P<0.01).结论 自知力评定量表中文版具有良好的信度和效度. Objective To investigate reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the schedule for assessment of insight (SAI).Methods The original version of SAI was translated into Chinese and then backtranslated into English to develop the Chinese version of SAI which reliability and validity were tested.220 subjects who met the diagnosis of Schizophrenia,schizophreniform disorder,schizoaffective disorder,delusional disorder or brief psychotic disorder were assessed.Results The Cronbach's α was 0.890 ; the test-retest reliability was 0.742 ; the inter-rater reliability was 0.986.Three main factors were obtained from the factor load matrix as awareness of illness,ability to relabel psychotic experience,compliance with treatment.The loading coefficient were 0.883-0.944.The correlation of the SAI total score and three subscales with insight of PANSS were-0.635,-0.305,-0.631 and-0.512 respectively (P 〈 0.01).Conclusion The SAI has good reliability and validity.The scale is useful to measure insight in psychosis.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第8期752-754,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
关键词 自知力 信度 效度 心理测量学 精神病 Insight Reliability Validity Psychometrics Psychosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献27

  • 1曾伟杰,支晓兴,吴新文,张东清,周静,夏菱,郑耕宇,薛松.南沙守礁人员心身健康状况调查研究[J].中国公共卫生,2004,20(7):842-843. 被引量:17
  • 2严和驳.心理生理障碍与心身疾病//沈渔邮.精神病学.5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:637-638.
  • 3Rruhwald S, Lofier H, Bhackl U,et al. Depression after cerebro-vascu-lar injury:review and differentiation from other psychiatric complica- tions. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr, 1999,67 : 155-162.
  • 4Prorokovi A, Cavka M, Cubela Adoric V. Psychosomatic and depres- sive symptoms in civilians, refugees, and soldiers: 1993-2004 longitu- dinal study in Croatia. Croat Med J. 2005,46:275-281.
  • 5Kurpatov VI, Iur thv GP. The diagnosis of premorbid psychosomatic states in ship-based specialists. Voen Med Zh, 1995,3:66-68,80.
  • 6Myznikov IL, Sobinin SV, Safronova KV. Prophylaxis of psychosomatic disorders in sailors. Aviakosm Ekolog Med ,2005,39:51-55.
  • 7Couture SM,Penn DL,Addinqton J, et al. Assessment of social judg- ments and complex ment~ states in the early phases of psychosis. Schizophr Res ,2008,100:237-241.
  • 8Keefe RS,Goldberg TE,Harvey PD,et al. The Brief Assessment of Cogni- tion in Schizophrenia: reliability,sensitivity,mid comparison with a standard neur~ogni/ive battery'. Sehizophr Res ,2004,68:283-297.
  • 9Keefe RS, Poe M, Walker TM, et al. The Schizophrenia Cognition Rat- ing Scale:an interview-based assessment and its relationship to cogni- tion, real-world functioning, and functional capacity. Am J Psychiatry, 2006,163:426432.
  • 10Chia MY, Chan WY, Chua KY, et al. The Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale:validation of an interview-based assessment of cognitive functioning in Asian patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res, 2010,178:33-38.

共引文献411

同被引文献112

引证文献11

二级引证文献100

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部