期刊文献+

论灾害人类学的研究方法 被引量:8

A Discussion on the Methods of Anthropological Research on Disasters
原文传递
导出
摘要 灾害人类学研究方法是人类学整体研究方法的一部分,其独特之处源自它的特殊场景。灾害人类学提倡多种研究方法相结合,如定性和定量研究相结合,个案研究和跨文化比较研究相结合等,同时重视田野调查中的参与观察、深度访谈、问卷调查、文献资料收集。灾害人类学的民族志叙事是一种以人和事件为中心的叙事。 The methods of anthropological research on disasters are a part of the methodology of anthropological researches in general.What makes disaster research unique is its special context.Disaster research employs a combination of various research methods,from qualitative to quantitative,from case study to cross-cultural study,and also emphasizes attention,to anthropological fieldwork,including participant observation,in-depthinterviewing,survey research,and documentary data collection.Ethnographic narrative in disaster research is a people-and-event-centered method.
作者 李永祥
出处 《民族研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期55-64,124-125,共10页 Ethno-National Studies
基金 2011年国家社会科学基金西部项目“云南少数民族地区防灾减灾的理论和实践研究”(批准号:11XSH018) 教育部重点研究基地重大项目“灾害人类学的理论和实践研究”(批准号:12JJD850003)的阶段性成果
关键词 灾害人类学 田野调查 跨文化比较 民族志叙事 anthropological research on disasters fieldwork cross-cultural comparison ethnographic narrative
  • 相关文献

参考文献53

  • 1Thomas E. Drabek, "Methodology of Studying Disasters: Past Patterns and Future Possibilities," American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 13, No. 3 ,January 1970.
  • 2Robert A. Stallings, "Methods of Disaster Research: Unique or Not," International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, vol. 15 ,No. 1, March 1997.
  • 3Waiter Gillis Peacock,"Cross-National and Comparative Disaster Research," International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, vol. 15, No. 1, March 1997.
  • 4Russell R. Dynes, "The Comparative Study of Disaster: A Social Organizational Approach," Mass Emergencies, vol. 1 ,No. 1,1975.
  • 5Walter Gillis Peacock,"Cross-national and Comparative Disaster Research," International Journal o Mass Emergencies and Disasters, vol. 15 ,No. 1, March 1997.
  • 6Dennis B. McGi|vray and Michele R. Gamburd, Tsunami Recovery in Sri Lanka, Landon and New York: Routledge Taylor Francis Group, 2010.
  • 7Michele R. Gamburd and Dennis B. McGilvray, "Sri Lanka's Post-Trunami Recovery : Cultural Traditions, Social Structures and Power Struggles," Anthropology News, vol. 51, Issue 7, October 2010.
  • 8Brenda Philips,"Qualitative Methods and Disaster Research," International Journal oMass Emergencies and Disasters, vol. 15 ,No. 1 ,March 2997.
  • 9Anthony Oliver-Smith and Susanna M. Hoffman, "Introduction: Why Anthropologists Should Study Disaster, "in Susanna M. Hoffman and Anthony Oliver-Smith, eds. , Catastrophe and Culture: The Anthropology of Disaster,Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of American Research Press, 2002.
  • 10安东尼·奥利弗-史密斯,苏珊娜·M·霍夫曼,彭文斌.人类学者为何要研究灾难[J].民族学刊,2011,2(4):1-7. 被引量:44

二级参考文献39

  • 1郑凡.关于建立中国民族社会学数据库的设想和倡议[J].云南社会科学,1995(5):50-54. 被引量:2
  • 2陈庆德.人类学中的观察与理论预设[J].思想战线,2005,31(1):13-20. 被引量:15
  • 3高琴.民族志和口述史的内在类同[J].民俗研究,2001(1):144-149. 被引量:9
  • 4马林诺夫斯基.《西太平洋的航海者》[M].华夏出版社,2002年.第4页.
  • 5乔治·瑞泽尔.《后现代社会理论》[M].华夏出版社,2003年版.第174页.
  • 6马克斯·韦伯.《社会科学方法论》[M].中央编译出版社,2002年版.第136页,第21页.
  • 7张寅德.《叙述学研究》[M].中国社会科学出版社,1989年版.第294页.
  • 8马歇尔·萨林斯 赵丙祥译.《文化与实践理性》[M].上海人民出版社,2002年版..
  • 9米歇尔·福柯 谢强 马月译.《知识考古学》[M].三联书店,1998年版.第176-178页.
  • 10卡西尔.《人论》[M].上海译文出版社,1985年版..

共引文献94

同被引文献148

引证文献8

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部