期刊文献+

最终需求模式演变、产业结构变迁与CO_2排放——基于投入产出模型和SDA方法的分析 被引量:5

Evolution of Final Demand Pattern,Changes in Industrial Structure and CO_2 Emission in China——Based on Input-output Model and SDA Method
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于非竞争型投入产出模型测算了2002~2010年最终消费、资本形成和出口对CO2排放的拉动规模,使用SDA方法对CO2排放增量进行影响因素分解,并对最终需求模式在CO2排放中的作用机制进行深入分析。研究结果显示,三类最终需求在拉动CO2排放中的作用存在很大差异,从污染的绝对量来看由大到小依次是投资、消费和出口,从污染的增量来看依次是投资、出口和消费。这一现象与产业结构变动密切相关,消费增长引起的产业结构变动有利于降低碳排放,而投资增长的效应则相反。要同时实现经济结构转型和低碳发展两大目标,必须进行最终需求模式调整,建立以居民消费为主导的经济发展模式。 In this paper, CO2 emissions from final consumption, investment and export during 2002-2010 are calculated and the functions of final demand pattern and industrial structure in CO2 emissions are analyzed based on the input-output model; then the impacts on the CO2 emissions are examined by the structural decomposition method. Results show that the roles of the three kinds of final demand in pulling CO2 emissions are quite different; in order of most polluting in absolute quantity it goes: investment, consump- tion and export; and investment, export and consumption in pollution increment; this phenomenon is closely related with the industrial structure. This paper proposes that expanding consumer demand helps to realize the two major goals of industrial structure optimization and emission reduction.
作者 宋爽 樊秀峰
出处 《山西财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第9期73-83,共11页 Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
关键词 低碳经济 最终需求模式 产业结构 投入产出分析 SDA方法 low-carbon economy final demand pattern industrial structure input-output analysis structural decompositionanalysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献131

共引文献621

同被引文献55

  • 1刘遵义,陈锡康,杨翠红,Leonard K.Cheng,K.C.Fung,Yun-Wing Sung,祝坤福,裴建锁,唐志鹏.非竞争型投入占用产出模型及其应用——中美贸易顺差透视[J].中国社会科学,2007(5):91-103. 被引量:327
  • 2Ang B W, Zhang F Q. A Survey of Index Decomposition Analysis in Energy and Environmental Studies [ J]. Energy, 2000, ( 12 ) : 1149 - 1176.
  • 3Ang B W. Decomposition Analysis for Policymaking in Energy: Which Is the Preferred Method [J]. Energy, 2004, (9) :1131 - 1139.
  • 4Fan Ying, Liu Lancui, Wu Gang, et al. Changes in Carbon Intensity in China: Empirical Findings from 1980 - 2003 [J]. Ecological Economics, 2007, (62) :683 -691.
  • 5Govinda R, Timilsina, Ashish Shrestha. Transport Sector CO2 Emissions Growth in Asia: Underlying Factors and Policy Options [ J]. Energy Policy, 2009, ( 11 ) :4523 -4539.
  • 6Zhang Y. Structural Decomposition Analysis of Sources of Decarbonizing Economic Development in China: 1999 - 2006 [ J ]. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68:2399 -2405.
  • 7Dietzenbacher E, Los B. Structural Decomposition Techniques: Sense and Sensitivity [ J]. Economic Systems Research, 1998, (10) :307 - 323.
  • 8Ang B. Decomposition Analysis for Policymaking in Energy: Which Is the Preferred Method? [J]. Ener- gy Policy,2004,32(9) :1131-1139.
  • 9Fisher K,Gary H. What is Driving Chings Decline in Energy Intensity? [J]. Resource and Energy Eco- nomics,2004,26(1) :77-97.
  • 10Giblin A. Modelling the Impacts of A Carbon Emis- sion-differentiated Vehicle Tax System on CO2 Emis sions Intensity from New Vehicle Purchases in Ire land[J]. Erzergy Policy, 2009,37(4) ..1 404-1 411.

引证文献5

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部