期刊文献+

区间数的多目标格序决策方法改进研究 被引量:1

Improving Study of Approach to Multiple Attribute Lattice Order Decision-Making of Interval Numbers
原文传递
导出
摘要 格序决策方法在对区间数进行优劣排序方面尚有改进完善的余地,通过研究发现,改进后的格序决策方法在不可比较区间数的优劣排序上不必求出拟上、下确界,也没必要绘制偏好结构图和海赛图来进行整个过程的优劣程度排序.通过算例比较验证了改进后的方法更加简洁有效,更加有利于提高决策的效率. The lattice order decision-making method still has leeway to be improved and perfected , by studying shows lattice order decision-making method to be improved need nether calculate the ordering superior or inferior being in progress to lattice order and nor draw preference structural drawing and Hassel picture to carry out entire process in interval numbers. Having been testified the method to be improved comparatively concisely and effectively by calculating an example, it is especially beneficial to improve decision-making efficiency.
出处 《数学的实践与认识》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第18期146-150,共5页 Mathematics in Practice and Theory
基金 国家自然科学基金(70371026) 山东省高等学校科技计划项目(J12LN52) 鲁东大学校博士基金(LY2012016)
关键词 区间数 格序 决策 改进 interval numbers lattice order decision -making improve
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献51

  • 1徐泽水.模糊综合评价的排序方法研究[A]..Systems Engineering, Systems Science and Complexity Research [C].Research Information Ltd出版社, Hemel Hempstead Hp2 7TD, United Kingdom,2000.507- 511.
  • 2Hawng C L, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making[ M ]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg New York,1981.1-107.
  • 3Yoon K. The propagation of errors in multiple-attribute decision analysis: a practical approach[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1989,40(7):681-686.
  • 4Brson N, Mobolurin A. An action learning evaluation procedure for multiple criteria decision making problems[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997,96:379-386.
  • 5Sajjad Z M. Incorporating the uncertainty of decision judgments in the analytic hierarchy process[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1991,53 :206-216.
  • 6Birkhoff G. Lattice theory[ M]. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, Volume XXV, Providence, 1973.1-280.
  • 7Yoon K. The propagation of errors in multiple-attribute decision analysis : A practical approach [J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1989, 40(7): 681- 686.
  • 8Huynh V-N, Nakamori Y, Tu-Bao Ho, et al. Multiple- attribute decision making under uncertainty: The evi- dential reasoning approach revisited[J]. Systems, Man and Cybernetics (Part A) : Systems and Humans, 1EEE Transactions, 2006, 36(4): 804-822.
  • 9Bryson N, Mobolurin A. An action learning evaluation procedure for multiple criteria decision making problems[J]. EurJOperRes, 1996, 96(3) : 379-386.
  • 10Xu D L, Yang J B, Wang Y M. The evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under interval uncertainty[J]. Eur J Oper Res, 2006, 174(3): 1914-1943.

共引文献533

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部