期刊文献+

户籍歧视对城乡收入差距的影响 被引量:250

The Effects of Household Registration System Discrimination on Urban-rural Income Inequality in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文侧重评估户籍歧视对城乡收入差距产生的影响。为了克服个体户籍类型的自选择和样本偏差问题,本文重点考察了近年来户籍属性发生转换的群体,并采用倾向得分匹配与双重差分的方法来构造反事实,从而在拟实验环境下去估计户籍歧视的价值。在2007年与2008年中国城乡劳动力流动面板数据的基础上,本文尽可能多地控制了可观测因素、随时间不变及随时间同步变化的不可观测因素的影响,从而得到户籍歧视对个体收入的纯影响。结果表明,仅仅因为是户籍职业选择歧视,农户个体的收入将会减少3.5%。在剔除户籍歧视因素后,整体收入差距会明显下降,平均来看,基尼系数会从0.499下降为0.488,从而表明户籍歧视对我国收入差距有显著影响。 Abstract :The target of this paper is to measure the discrimination effect of household registration system (hukou policy) on urban-rural income inequality. In order to overcome the self-selection problem from hukou type change and the biased problem because of the absence of experiment data, we use the Propensity Score Matching with Difference-in-Difference method to construct counterfactual to evaluate the discrimination effect of hukou on urban-rural income inequality with RUMIC 2007/2008 panel dataset. The results demonstrate that hukou policy does exert significant discriminatory impacts on urban-rural income inequality, while urban hukou increases income level by 3.5% on average. Meanwhile, it actually belongs to a kind of invisible occupation discrimination effect coming from hukou according to the income definition in this paper. After excluding the hukou discrimination, the overall income inequality decreases to a large extent, and the Gini coefficient drops from . 499 to 0. 488. So, it shows a large impact of hukou discrimination on income inequality in China.
作者 万海远 李实
出处 《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第9期43-55,共13页 Economic Research Journal
关键词 户籍制度 歧视 拟实验评估方法 收入差距 Household Registration System Discrimination Quasi-experiment Evaluation Approach Income Inequality
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1李实,罗楚亮.中国收入差距究竟有多大?--对修正样本结构偏差的尝试[J].经济研究,2011,46(4):68-79. 被引量:249
  • 2吴开亚,张力.发展主义政府与城市落户门槛:关于户籍制度改革的反思[J].社会学研究,2010(6):58-85. 被引量:82
  • 3Altonji Joseph, G. , and A. Dunn Thomas, 1996, "The Effects of Family Characteristics on the Return to Education", Review of Economics and Statistics, 78 (4), 692--704.
  • 4Becker, S. O. , and A. Ichino, 2002, "Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Based on Propensity Scores", STATA Journal, 2 (4), 358--377.
  • 5Black, D. , and J. Smith, 2004, "How Robust Is the Evidence on the Effects of College Quality? Evidence from Matching", Journal of Econometrics, 121, 99--124.
  • 6Brandt, L. , and C. A. Holz, 2006, "Spatial Price Differences in China: Estimates and Implications", Economic Development and Cultural Change, 55 ( 1 ) , 43--86.
  • 7Chan, Kamwing, 1996, "Post-Mao China: A Two-Class Urban Society in the Making", International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 20, 134--150.
  • 8De Brauw, Alan, and Scott Rozelle, 2006, "Reconciling the Returns to Education in Rural China", Working Paper, Williams CollegeDepartment of Economics.
  • 9Dehejia, Rajeev H. , 2005, "Practical Propensity Score Matching: A Reply to Smith and Todd", Journal of Econometrics, 125,355-- 364.
  • 10Gerfin, M. , and M. Lechner, 2002, "Microeconometric Evaluation of the Active Labour Market Policy in Switzerland", Economic Journal, 112, 854--893.

共引文献329

同被引文献3704

引证文献250

二级引证文献4147

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部