期刊文献+

企业绩效考评中的推定原则与逆向选择

Presumption Principle and Adverse Selection of Performance Evaluation
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文旨在将对逆向选择问题的研究延伸到企业绩效考评过程中。在信息不对称条件下,考评主体不得不在企业绩效考评中引入合格推定原则。在基于合格推定的考评对象的行为决策模型中,考评主体认定的绩效与绩效的自然状态发生偏离,一部分事实不达标绩效被推定为达标绩效。将不达标绩效推定为达标的可能性驱使考评对象有可能选择偷懒策略,即生成逆向选择。按照完全理性假定,考评对象按后悔值最小原则进行行为策略抉择。走出绩效推定情境中逆向选择困境的基本思路是提高考评对象采用偷懒策略的后悔值。为此,一方面要提高考评主体认知考评对象实施偷懒策略的概率;另一方面要增大考评对象实施偷懒策略的或有损失。 This paper aims to extend the adverse selection issue to enterprise performance evaluation process. The evaluators have to introduce presumption principle into performance evaluation under information asymmetry. Based on the decision- making model of the assumed qualified evaluator's behavior, the performance indentified by the evaluators deviates from the natural state of the performance, and some factual substandard performance is presumed standard, which may make the evaluation objects choose lazy strategies, i.e. generating adverse selection. According to the assumption of complete rationality, evaluation objects determine their behavioral strategies by the minimum principle of regret value. To avoid the adverse selection dilemma, it is essential to improve the regret value of lazy strategies adopted by evaluation objects, improve the probability that evaluation subjects recognize their lazy strategies, and increase the losses caused by lazy strategies.
机构地区 中南大学商学院
出处 《系统工程》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第8期106-111,共6页 Systems Engineering
关键词 绩效考评 推定原则 逆向选择 后悔值 Performance Evaluation Presumption Principle Adverse Selection Regret Value
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Akerlof G A. The market for lemons: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1970,84 (3) .. 488 500.
  • 2Spence M. Job market signaling[J] The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1973,87 (3) : 355- :374.
  • 3Stiglitz J E, Rothschild M. Equilibrium in com- petitive insurance markets: An essay on the economics of imperfect information[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1976,90 (4) : 629 49.
  • 4潘勇,乔晓东.逆向选择与中国电子商务市场声誉机制的本土性研究——以淘宝网为例[J].商业经济与管理,2012(1):13-18. 被引量:12
  • 5Ross S A. The economic theory of agency: The principals' problem[J]. American Economic Review,1973,63(2) : 134- 139.
  • 6Jensen M, Meckling W. Theory of firm:Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, (4) : 305 360.
  • 7彼得.F.德鲁克.公司绩效测评[J].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004:52.
  • 8周其仁.市场里的企业:一个人力资本与非人力资本的特别合约[J].经济研究,1996,31(6):71-79. 被引量:2174
  • 9Bernardin H J. Behavioral expectation scales versus summated sealesz A fair er comparison[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, (62) : 422- 427.
  • 10Landy F J, Farr J L. Performance rating [J] Psychological Bulletin, 1980, (87) : 72- 107.

二级参考文献46

共引文献2216

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部