期刊文献+

基于PCR和巢式PCR技术的甘蔗黑穗病早期检测 被引量:8

Early Stage Molecular Diagnosis Based on PCR and Nested PCR Assays for Sugarcane Smut Disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了探索甘蔗黑穗病早期检测的可能性,应用本实验室已建立的甘蔗黑穗病菌PCR和巢式PCR检测技术,对经人工接种甘蔗黑穗病菌冬孢子的植蔗叶片进行检测,并调查采样植株的黑穗病实际发生情况。结果表明,黑穗病实际发生率80%(16/20),PCR检测阳性率35%(7/20),巢式PCR检测阳性率70%(14/20),PCR和巢式PCR检测为阳性的样品,其植株黑穗病发生率几乎为100%。这一结果表明了甘蔗黑穗病菌PCR和巢式PCR可用于甘蔗黑穗病早期检测,但巢式PCR检测结果与黑穗病的实际发生情况比较吻合,更适合于甘蔗黑穗病早期检测。另外,太幼小的甘蔗株(三叶期前),PCR和巢式PCR均不适合于甘蔗黑穗病早期检测。 In order to explore the possibility of early stage detection for sugarcane smut disease, caused by the basidiomycetous fungus, Ustilago scitaminea, samples of the youngest expanding leaf upon growing point from plants derived from seedeane inoculated with U. scitamina teliospores by artificial inoculation method, were detected with PCR or nested PCR assays of U. scitamina developed by our laboratory, and actual smut occurrence of sampling plants was surveyed. The results showed that the eventual smut incidence in the field, PCR and nested PCR detection positive rate was 80% (16/20), 35% (7/20) and 70% (14/20), respectively, and positive samples of PCR or nested PCR detection could nearly 100% produce whips of smut in the field. It indicated that the PCR or nested PCR technique could be used for the early stage detection of sugarcane smut, but the nested PCR technique was more suitable than PCR technique, because the results of nested PCR assays appeared to correspond quite well with the eventual percentage of seedlings were very young, before 3-leaf stage, PCR or detection of sugarcane smut. whips produced in the field. In addition, if sugarcane nested PCR assays were not suitable for the early stage
出处 《热带作物学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第9期1756-1760,共5页 Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops
基金 广东省科技攻关项目(No.2010B020302001) 国家甘蔗产业技术体系建设专项资金项目(No.CARS-20-1-4)
关键词 甘蔗黑穗病 甘蔗鞭黑粉菌 PCR 巢式PCR 分子检测 Sugarcane smut Ustilago scitamina PCR Nested PCR Molecular detection
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Antoine R. Smut[M]// Martin J P, Abbott E V, Hughes C G. Sugarcane Disease of the World. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Company, 1961: 327-354.
  • 2Riley I T, Jubb T F, Egan B T, et al. First outbreak of sugarcane smut in Australia[J]. Proceeding of International Socity of Sugar Cane Technology, 1999, 23(2): 333-336.
  • 3Nzioki H S, Jamoza J E, Olweny C O, et al. Characterization of physiologic race of sugarcane smut(Ustilago scitaminea:n Kenya[J]. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 2010, 4(16): 1 694-1 697.
  • 4熊国如,李增平,赵婷婷,蔡文伟,王俊刚,王文治,冯翠莲,张雨良,张树珍.海南蔗区甘蔗病害种类及发生情况[J].热带作物学报,2010,31(9):1588-1595. 被引量:55
  • 5许莉萍,陈如凯.甘蔗黑穗病及其抗病育种的现状与展望[J].福建农业学报,2000,15(2):26-31. 被引量:52
  • 6沈万宽,邓海华.引进甘蔗品种黑穗病抗性鉴定及结果分析[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(19):234-238. 被引量:24
  • 7Comstock J C, Ferreira S A, 'Few T L. Hawaii's approach to control sugarcane smut[J]. Plant Disease, 1983, 67(4): 453-457.
  • 8Albert H H, Schenek S. PCR amplification from a homolog of the bE mating-type gene as a sensitive assay for the presence of Ustilago scitaminea DNA[J]. Plant Disease, 1996, 10: 1 189-1 192.
  • 9Singh N, Somai B M, Pillay D. Smut disease assessment by PCR and microscopy in inoculated tissue cultured sugarcane cultivars[J]. Plant science, 2004, 167: 987-994.
  • 10Shen W K, Xi P G, Li M H, et ol. Development of a sensitive nested-PCR assay for detection of Ustilago scitaminea[J]. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2012, 11(46): 10541-10547.

二级参考文献82

共引文献181

同被引文献168

引证文献8

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部