期刊文献+

大学生学习观对学习方式影响的实证研究——基于不同课堂学习环境的分析 被引量:17

A Study of the Impacts of College Students' Learning Conception on Their Learning Approaches——Based on Different Classroom Environments
下载PDF
导出
摘要 大学生学习观对学习方式具有重要影响,不同的学习观对学习方式具有不同的影响:应用知识学习观对学生深层学习方式具有很高的正向预测力,对浅层学习方式具有负向预测力;记忆知识学习观对浅层学习方式具有很高的正向预测力。在不同的课堂学习环境中,学习观对学习方式的影响力存在不同程度地"增强"或"减弱"。构建有助于增强师生之间以及生生之间交流互动的课堂学习环境,提升学生的学习参与性能够促使学生更倾向于深层学习方式。 College students' learning conception has considerable impact on their learning approaches, and different learning conceptions have different impacts on learning approaches: Working-knowledge conception has extremely high positive predictive power on deep-learning approach, whereas relevantly negative predictive power on the superficial-learning approach; memorizing-knowledge conception has significant positive power on superficial-learning approach. The influence of learning conception on approaches to learning may be intensified or weakened with different classroom environments; structuring classroom environments that emphasizes the participation of students encourage students to choose deep- learning approach.
作者 杨院
机构地区 天津大学
出处 《国家教育行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第9期75-80,共6页 Journal of National Academy of Education Administration
基金 国家社科基金(教育学科)国家重点课题(AIA100007)
关键词 学习方式 学习观 课堂学习环境 approaches to learning learning conception classroom environment
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Biggs, J. The Role of Metaleaming in Study Processes [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1985, (55): 185-212.
  • 2Marton, F., Saljo, R. Approaches to learning [A]. F Marton et al. (eds). The Experience of Learning [C]. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1984. 36-55.
  • 3迈克尔·普罗瑟.基思·特里格维尔.理解教育学:高校教学策略[M].潘红,陈锵明译.北京:北京大学出版社.2007.109-111.
  • 4史秋衡,郭建鹏.我国大学生学情状态与影响机制的实证分析[J].教育研究,2012,33(2):109-121. 被引量:200
  • 5Fraser, B. J. Classroom Environment [M]. London: Croom Helm, 1986. 70.
  • 6雷雳,张雷.多层线性模型的原理及应用[J].首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2002(2):110-114. 被引量:28

二级参考文献12

  • 1Diseth, A. Students' evaluation of teaching, approaches to learning, and academic achievement [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Researeh, 2007, (2).
  • 2Cano F. Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2005, (2).
  • 3Prosser, M., & Trigweil, K. Perceptions of the teaching environment and its relationship to approaches to teaching [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1997, ( 1 ).
  • 4Hu, L., & Bender, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternations [J]. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, (6).
  • 5Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leu.ng, D. The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2001, (1).
  • 6Entwistle, N., Tait, H., & MaCune, V. Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts [J]. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2000, ( 1 ).
  • 7Marton, F., Wen, Q., & Wong, K. 'Read a hundred times and the meaning will appear…' Changes in Chinese University students' views of the temporal structure of learning [J]. Higher Education, 2005, (3).
  • 8Marton, F., Dall' Alba, G., & Beaty. E. Conceptions of learning [J]. International Journal of Educational Research, 1993, (19).
  • 9Ramsden, P. A performance indicator of teaching quality in ihigher education: The course experience questionnaire [J]. Studies in Higher Education, 1991, i2).
  • 10Marton, F., & Saljo, R. On qualitative differences in learning I - Outcome and process [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, ( 1 ).

共引文献226

同被引文献177

引证文献17

二级引证文献131

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部