期刊文献+

气囊与旋压式桡动脉止血器的应用效果分析 被引量:8

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解经桡动脉行冠状动脉介入术后使用TRBand气囊止血器和天淇旋压止血器的应用效果、局部不舒适程度和并发症发生情况。方法选取由同一医生负责、准备择期经桡动脉行冠状动脉介入术的患者200例,随机将研究对象分为2组各100例。I组术后使用TRBand气囊止血器进行穿刺处止血,Ⅱ组术后使用天淇旋压止血器,对2种止血器应用效果进行对比分析。结果2组患者末梢动脉血氧饱和度和局部并发症发生情况相比差异无统计学意义。结论TRBand气囊止血器与天淇旋压止血器均可达到有效止血;天淇旋压止血器造成的局部皮损恢复时间长,对患者影响大。
作者 张存 刘纯艳
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 北大核心 2013年第28期25-26,共2页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Jeffrey M ,Schussler MD.Effectiveness and safety of transradial artery access for cardiac catheterization. Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, 2011,24(3 ) : 205-209.
  • 2朱中生,陈绍良,叶飞,张俊杰,田乃亮,林松,刘志忠.TR Band和RDP桡动脉止血装置在经桡动脉介入术后的应用[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2009,13(39):7699-7702. 被引量:6
  • 3Sudhir R. A randomized comparison of TR band and radistop hemo- static compression devices after transradial coronary intervention. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2010,76 : 660- 667.
  • 4Patll MW,Brandts B,Rust H,et al. Vascular complications of percuta- neous transradial coronary angiography and coronary intervention. Med Ktin,2005,100: 377-382.
  • 5周玉杰,赵迎新,曹政,傅向华,聂斌,刘宇扬,郭永和,成万钧,贾德安.经桡动脉介入诊疗术后急性桡动脉闭塞的发生率及其预测因素[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(22):1531-1534. 被引量:37
  • 6Pancholy S, Coppola J,Patel T, et al. Prevention of radialartery occlu- sion patient haemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET Study):a ran- domised comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2008,72: 335-340.
  • 7Stella PR, Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, et al. Incidence and outcome of radial artery occlusion following transradial artery coronary angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovase Diagn, 1997,40: 156-158.
  • 8Nagai S,Abe S,Sato T,et al. Ultrasonic assessment of vascular com- plications incoronary angiography and angioplasty after transradial approach.Am J Cardiol, 1999,83 : 180-186.

二级参考文献21

  • 1Lim VY,Chan CN,Kwok V,et al.Transradial access for coronary angiography and angioplasty:a novel approach.Singapore Med J.2003;44(11):563-569.
  • 2Louvard Y,Benamer H,Garot P;OCTOPLUS Study Group.Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiography and angioplasty in octogenarians(the OCTOPLUS study).Am J Cardiol.2004;94(9):1177-1180.
  • 3Franchi E,Marino P,Biondi-Zoccai GG,et al.Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary procedures.Curr Cardiol Rep.2009;11(5):391-397.
  • 4Hamon M,Coutance G.Transradial intervention for minimizing bleeding complications in percutaneous coronary intervention.Am J Cardiol.2009;104(5 Suppl):55C-59C.
  • 5Pancholy SB.Impact of two different hemostatic devices on radial artery outcomes after transradial catheterization.J Invasive Cardiol.2009;21(3):101-104.
  • 6Elgharib NZ,Shah UH,Coppola JT.Transradial cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention:a review.Coron Artery Dis.2009.[Epub ahead of print].
  • 7Rathore S,Hakeem A,Pauriah M,et al.A comparison of the transradial and the transfemoral approach in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv.2009;73(7):883-887.
  • 8De Carlo M,Borelli q Gistri R,et al.Effectiveness of the transradial approach to reduce bleedings in patients undergoing urgent coronary angioplasty with GPllb/III inhibitors for acute coronary syndromes.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv.2009;74(3):408-415.
  • 9Chatelain P,Arceo A,Rombaut E,et al.New device for compression of the radial artery after diagnostic and interventional cardiac procedures.Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn.1997;40(3):297-300.
  • 10Ochiai M,Sakai H,Takeshita S,et al.Efficacy of anew hemostatic device,Adapty,after transradial coronary angiography and intervention.J Invasive Cardiol.2000;12(12):618-622.

共引文献40

同被引文献57

  • 1黄丽萍,罗利霞,吴同果.两种途径行冠脉介入治疗后使用动脉压迫器所致并发症的观察与护理[J].吉林医学,2013,34(13):2555-2557. 被引量:8
  • 2王丽姿,姚翠萍,朱莲香,李秋玲.经桡动脉行冠状动脉支架植入术患者的腕部护理[J].中国实用护理杂志,2005,21(8):10-11. 被引量:79
  • 3Dzavik V, Sleeper L A, Picard M H, et al. Outcome of pa- tients aged > or = 75 years in the SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries in cardiogenic shock (SHOCK) trial: do elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock respond diffe- rently to emergent revascularization? [J]. Am Heart J, 2005,149(6) : 1128-1134.
  • 4王静,颜琼.桡动脉介入治疗术后穿刺点压迫止血的进展与分析[J].中国实用护理杂志,2013,29(1):9-10.
  • 5Taishi Y,Tsunekezu K,Tetsumin L,et al. Assessment of acute injuries and chronic intimal thickening of the radial artery after trattsradial coronary intervention by optical coherence [ J ]. Eur Heart J, 2010,31 (13) : 1608-1615.
  • 6Sudhir R, Rodney H, Maheshwar P.A randomized comparison of TR Band and Radistop Hemostatic Compression Devices after transra- dial coronary intervention [ J ].Catheterization and Cardiovascular In- terventions,2010,76:660-667.
  • 7Yonetsu T, Kakuta T,Lee T,et al.Assessment of acute injuries and chronic intimal thickening of the radial artery after transradial coronary intervention by optical coherence tomography [J].Eur Hearfl,2010,31 (13 ): 1608-1615.
  • 8Christenson R, Staab EV, Burko H,et al.Pressure dressings and postarteriographic care of the femoral puncture site[J]. Radiology, 1976,119(1) :97-99.
  • 9TisserandR.Theart of ammatherapy[M].林榆,译.台湾:世茂出版社,2001:18-120.
  • 10Francesco B, Carlo T, Mario Attilio M, et al. Vascular complications and access crossover in 10,676 transradial percutaneous coronary procedures.[J]. American Heart Journal, 2012, 163(2):230-238.

引证文献8

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部