摘要
黑格尔在完成对英国古典政治经济学批判的基础上用"需要—欲望"思辨机制构建精神思辨体系,而马克思谈论需要问题则是面向人类生存之根本并对前者构成批判。后来的西方马克思主义政治经济学批判理论家们仅抓住社会发展的某一因素所完成的批判工作都停留于表象世界,未曾像马克思那样触及人类生存需要之根基。由此马克思针对需要和资本逐利之本性欲望问题所展开的批判便具有根本性指导意义,这恰是当代西方理论批判家们无法超越的。
Based on the criticism of English classical political economics, rtegei u^eu dialectic mechanism of need-desire to formulate his whole spirit system, but Marx faced the essence of human survival when arguing the problem of need and criticized the former. Later political economic critics in western Marxism only grasped a certain factor of social develop- ment, and their critical work stayed in the world as presentation, so they could not touch the base of the need of human survival like Marx. Therefore, Marx' s criticism of nature desire of need and profit-driven capital is of basic guidance, which precisely cannot be surpassed by contemporary western theoretical critics.
出处
《上海财经大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第5期25-32,共8页
Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
基金
中国博士后第53批科学基金项目"金融资本视域下的西方马克思主义政治经济学批判研究"(2013M531155)
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"马克思劳动批判理论视域下的社会经济正义问题研究"(13YJC710049)