期刊文献+

国家对个人所有文化财产出口控制的法律分析

Legal Analysis of Export Control of Individual-owned Cultural Property
原文传递
导出
摘要 一国政府对个人所有的文化财产实施出口控制需要综合考虑合理性、合法性和可行性之间的关系。合法性涉及一国实施出口控制的权限和相应后果。可行性涉及一国的出口控制法律能否被他国所承认和执行。中国的文化财产出口控制法律体制具有明显的国家主义与民族主义特征,其域外效力有限,为提升该法律制度在国际层面的合法性和可行性,应重新审视该制度的合理性。 The implementation of export control of individual-owned cultural property needs to comprehensively take the relationship among rationality, legality and {easibility into account. Legality refers to the competence and corresponding consequences of the implemen- tation of export control. Feasibility concerns the recognition and enforcement of export con- trol law of a country in other countries. The legal system of export control of cultural proper- ty in China is obviously characterized by nationalism and has limited extraterritorial effects. In order to promote the legality and feasibility of this legal system at an international level, the rationality should be reconsidered.
作者 孙南申 彭岳
出处 《上海财经大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期33-40,56,共9页 Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家社科基金项目"文化财产的跨国流转与返还法律问题研究"(09BFX087)
关键词 个人所有 文化财产 出口控制 合理性、合法性和可行性 individual ownership cultural property export control rationality, legality and feasibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Alexander A. Bauer, New Ways of Thinking about Cultural Property: A Critical Appraisal of the Antiquities Trade Debates, Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 31, 2008, p. 695.
  • 2Panel Report on India-Quantitative Restrictions, paras. 5. 129--5. 130.
  • 3Factory at Chorzow (Ger. v. Pol. ), 1928 P. C. I. J (set. A) No. 17, at 47 (Sept. 13) ; Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law of the United States 712 (1987).
  • 4Mads Andenas and Stefan Zleptnig, Proportionality: WTO Law: in Comparative Perspective, Texas Inter- national Law Journal Vol. 42, 2007,p. 372.
  • 5Holy Monasteries v. Greece, Judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A, No. 301 -- A; (1995) 20 EHRR 1.
  • 6Attorney-General of New Zealand v. Ortiz et a1,19823 W. L. R. 571 (C. A. ).
  • 7彭岳.国际投资中的间接征收及其认定[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2009,51(2):64-72. 被引量:20

二级参考文献45

  • 1房秋实.浅析网络虚拟财产[J].法学评论,2006,24(2):73-77. 被引量:60
  • 2蔡从燕.效果标准与目的标准之争:间接征收认定的新发展[J].西南政法大学学报,2006,8(6):85-91. 被引量:25
  • 3张乃根.试析《国家责任条款》的“国际不法行为”[J].法学家,2007(3):95-101. 被引量:21
  • 4Article 2(c) of the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1974.
  • 5OECD Working Papers on International Investment No. 2004/4, "Indirect Expropriation" and "The Right to Regulate" in International Investment Law, footnote 1, September 2004.
  • 6Rudolf Dolzer, “Indirect Expropriations: New Developments?” 11 N. Y. U. Environmental L. J. 66.
  • 7William Michael Treanor, "The Original Understanding of the Takings Clause and the Political Process," 95 Colum. L. Rev. 782 (1995).
  • 8William Michael Treanor, "The Origins and Original Significance of the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment," 94 Yale L. J. 694.
  • 9National Mut. Ins. Co. v. Tidewater Transfer Co., 337 U.S. 582 (1949).
  • 10Charles A. Reich, "The New Property", 73 Yale L. J. 733.

共引文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部