摘要
我国审理企业破产案件的立法没有形成一个系统、完整的法律体系，规定过于粗疏，使得破产案件的审理程序成为民事诉讼中的一个薄弱环节。破产案件亟待明确的几个程序问题是，破产案件的当事人能否提出管辖异议及提出的时间，法院审理破产案件应采取什么方式，法院对破产案件的审理结果是采取裁定形式还是判决形式。笔者认为要保护当事人诉权，防止地方保护主义，应赋予当事人对破产案件提出管辖异议的权利，管辖异议提出的时间是债权人在申报债权期间，债务人在提出债务异议的期间。对破产案件的审理应采取公开开庭审理方式，使审判活动置于群众的监督之下。对案件的审理结果应用判决形式，使当事人享有对审理结果的上诉权，使“二审终审制”在破产案件中同样得到体现，以保证破产案件的审判质量。
Up till now no systematic and complete law has been enacted for handling enterprise bankruptcy cases. As regards enterprise bankruptcy cases, several issues need clarification: the right of the litigant to raise objection to administration and the time of objection-raising, the way the court tries the bankruptcy cases, the manner of presenting the try result- as a ruling or a verdict. The author of this paper holds that the litigant should be entitled to raising objection to administration and that the objection raised during the time when the case is being tried. In addition, it is recommended that enterprise bankruptcy cases should be tried openly to be supervised by the masses. Moreover, the try result should be presented as a verdict to endow the litigant with the right of appeal and ensure the try quality of bankruptcy cases.
