摘要
目的探讨对比分析C-反应蛋白和血常规测定的诊断作用的各自优点与缺点。方法回顾性分析2012年1月至2013年1月我院感染科收治的感染患者50例,以及常规体检正常的检查人群50例,将感染患者作为感染组,健康人群作为对照组,分别检测两组患者的C-反应蛋白和血常规,并进行比较分析。结果检查指标显示:两组患者的C-反应蛋白含量增高率、白细胞总数升高率及中性粒细胞升高率比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 C-反应蛋白和血常规在临床对感染的诊断中具有协同作用,两者联合,可有效准确的诊断出临床上的早期炎症,值得在临床上推广使用。
Objective To study the advantages and disadvantages of C-reactive protein and routine blood test respectively.Methods A retrospective analysis of 50 cases of infection were admitted in our hospital infection branch,and the inspection groups 50 cases with normal routine checkups,divided into infection group and the control group,two groups of patients was detected in the C-reactive protein and routine blood test,and gave the comparison analysis.Results Two groups of patients of C-reactive protein content,total number of white blood cells,neutrophils rise rate compared,the difference had statistical significance(P 0.05).Conclusions C-reactive protein combined with routine blood test in the clinical diagnosis of infection has synergy effect,can effectively diagnose early clinical inflammation,which is worth popularizing in clinic.
出处
《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》
2013年第17期2542-2543,共2页
Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
关键词
C-反应蛋白
血常规测定
诊断作用
C-reactive protein
Routine blood test
Diagnostic role