期刊文献+

双水平正压通气和经鼻持续呼吸道正压通气在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征撤机后应用的比较 被引量:20

Duo positive airway pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in treatment of preterm neonates with severe neonatal respiratory distress syndrome after extubation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 比较患有重度新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(NRDS)的早产儿撤机后使用双水平正压通气(DuoPAP)和持续呼吸道正压通气(nCPAP)的效果,确定DuoPAP是否可降低撤机失败率.方法 该试验为单中心随机对照试验,将胎龄29~34^6/7周患有重度NRDS需要有创呼吸,并且在出生后4周内撤机的早产儿随机分为DuoPAP组和nCPAP组,若2种方式不能维持则再次使用气管内插管、呼吸机辅助呼吸.撤机后72 h内需要再次插管上机为撤机失败.主要观察指标为撤机失败率及撤机失败原因.结果 DuoPAP组撤机失败率为11.43%(4/35例),明显低于nCPAP组(35.29%,12/34例)(P=0.02).2组总用氧时间、有创呼吸支持时间、气胸发病率、坏死性小肠结肠炎发病率、脑室内出血发病率(Ⅲ度以上)、全肠道喂养时间、总住院时间、恢复出生体质量时间、体质量增长率比较差异均无统计学意义.结论 与nCPAP相比,撤机后使用DuoPAP可明显降低重度NRDS患儿撤机失败率. Objective To determine whether duo positive airway pressure (DuoPAP) can decrease the rate of extubation failure in preterm neonates with severe neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS),in comparison to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP).Methods In this single-center,randomized controlled trial,infants (gestational ages 29-34^6/7 weeks) with NRDS who needed endotracheal intubation and met specific predetermined criteria for extubation by day within 4 weeks of birth were enrolled.Each infant was randomized to receive either DuoPAP or nCPAP soon after extubation.Extubation was deemed successful if reintubation was not needed for at least 72 h.If the 2 noninvasive ventilations were not effective,intubation and mechanical ventilation (MV) were used.The primary outcome was the rate of extubation failure and its causes within the first 72 hours of extubation.Results In this study,11.43 %(4/35 cases) infants were failed to be extubated in DuoPAP group,but 35.29% (12/34 cases) in nCPAP group,and there was significant difference between the 2 groups (P =0.02).No significant differences were noted between the 2 groups in total time of oxygen,total time on MV,pneumothorax,necrotising enterocolitis,intraventricular hemorrhage (grades Ⅲ and Ⅳ),retinopathy of prematurity,time to full feeds,recovery time of the birth weight,weight increasing rate and duration of hospitalization.Conclusion DuoPAP can decrease the rate of extubation failure in severe NRDS compared with nCPAP.
出处 《中华实用儿科临床杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第18期1376-1379,共4页 Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics
基金 国家自然科学基金(30973210)
关键词 新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征 无创呼吸支持模式 双水平正压通气 持续呼吸道正压 婴儿 新生 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome Noninvasive ventilation Duo positive airway pressure Continuous positive airway pressure infant, newborn
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

二级参考文献81

  • 1李秋平,黄海燕,封志纯,王斌,钱淑鸯,韩晓娟.NICU常频机械通气常见并发症临床特点及防治策略[J].中国实用儿科杂志,2004,19(6):358-360. 被引量:47
  • 2麦友刚,陈纯,徐令,苏浩彬,陈环.支气管肺发育不良症12例临床分析[J].广东医学,2005,26(9):1247-1248. 被引量:4
  • 3陈超,魏克伦,姚裕家,陈大庆.早产儿管理指南[J].中华儿科杂志,2006,44(3):188-191. 被引量:322
  • 4刘兆娥,余加林.机械通气新生儿撤机失败的肺外因素及对策[J].中国新生儿科杂志,2006,21(1):54-56. 被引量:13
  • 5陈静,蒋琦,林梅芳,谭稼荣.早产儿机械通气撤机后应用鼻塞持续气道正压通气对呼吸支持的评估[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2007,15(3):298-299. 被引量:3
  • 6邵肖梅,叶鸿瑶,丘小汕.实用新生儿学[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:807-808.
  • 7Lampland AL, Meyers PA, Worwa CT, et ah Gas exchange and lung inflammation using nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation versus synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in piglets with saline lavage-induced lung injury: an observational study. Crit Care Med, 2008, 36(1) : 183-187.
  • 8Davis PG, Lemyre B, de Paoli AG. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure ( NCPAP ) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2001, (3): CD003212.
  • 9Ho JJ, Subramaniam P, Henderson-Smart D J, et al. Continuous distending pressure for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2002, (2): CD002271.
  • 10Lemyre B, Davis PG, de Paoli AG. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for apnea of prematurity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2002, ( 1 ) : CD002272.

共引文献137

同被引文献179

引证文献20

二级引证文献106

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部