期刊文献+

两种流感病毒检测方法敏感性研究 被引量:5

Discussion on susceptibility of two detection methods of influenza virus
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的利用实时荧光PCR相对定量方法和细胞培养法比较不同方法检测流感病毒敏感性差异。方法将流感病毒咽拭子分别接种24代和42代狗肾传代细胞(MDCK),比较不同代数MDCK细胞培养获得的毒株的血凝滴度及细胞病变(CPE)。对流感病毒咽拭子和毒株分别进行实时荧光PCR,比较实验结果CP值。结果实时荧光PCR相对定量结果显示:毒株病毒载量是咽拭子病毒载量的10^4倍~10^5倍;接种24代MDCK细胞获得毒株血凝滴度略高于接种42代MDCK细胞获得的毒株,42代MDCK细胞CPE更为明显。结论结合实时荧光PCR检测和流感病毒培养可提高流感病毒毒株分离率,24~42代MDCK传代细胞对2012年甲3型流感病毒均具有较好的敏感性,低代数MDCK传代细胞更有利于提高甲3型流感病毒分离。 Objective To compare the difference of the sensitivity of real - time PCR assay and cell culture method in detection of influenza virus. Methods The influenza virus throat swabs were inoculated to the 24th - generation and the 42nd - genera- tion of MDCK passage cells to compare the hemagglutination titer and the eytopathy (CPE). The influenza virus throat swabs and the virus strains were detected by real - time PCR to compare the experimental results of CP. Results Real - time PCR re- sults displayed that the virus strain viral load was 10~ ~ 105 times of throat swab viral load;the strain hemagglutination titer from the 24th - generation was slightly higher than that from the 42nd - generation of MDCK cells ; the cytopathy of the 42 generation was more obviously than the 24 generation of MDCK cells. Conclusion It can increase the separation rate of virus strains by combining the real -time PCR assay and cell culture,24 -42 generation MDCK passage cells are sensitive to the influenza virus A3 in 2012, low algebraic MDCK passage cells is more propitious to improve the separation of influenza A3.
出处 《中国卫生检验杂志》 北大核心 2013年第11期2487-2488,2497,共3页 Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
关键词 MDCK细胞 流感病毒 实时荧光PCR 血凝实验 敏感性 MDCK cells Influenza virus Real - time PCR Hemagglutination test Sensitivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献22

共引文献43

同被引文献43

  • 1戚凤春,汪春义,张雪梅,王亚军,李晓波,贾媛,赵大鹏,盛军.两种细胞培养流感病毒的滴度比较[J].中国生物制品学杂志,2006,19(3):291-292. 被引量:23
  • 2范东瀛,陈俊英,张新文,李卫东,廖国阳.流感病毒在不同细胞中适宜培养条件的研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2007,29(6):510-512. 被引量:15
  • 3Monis PT, Giglio S. Nucleic acid amplification-based techniques for pathogen detection and identification [ J]. Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 2006, 6(1): 2-12.
  • 4Hill CS. Molecular diagnostic testing for infectious diseases using TMA technology [J]. Expert Rev Mol Diagn, :2001, 1 (4) : 445- 455.
  • 5Butot S, Le Guyader FS, Krol J, et al. Evaluation of various re- al-time RT-PCR assays for the detection and quantitation of hu- man. Norovirus [J]. J Virol Methods, 2010, 167(1) : 90-94.
  • 6Lowe P, OLoughlin P, Evans K, et al. Comparison of the Gen- Probe APTIMA Combo 2 Assay to the AMPLICOR CT/NG Assay for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Urine Samples from Australian Men and Women [ J]. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2006, 7 : 2619-2621.
  • 7Giachetti C, Linnen JM, Kolk DP, et al. Highly Sensitive Multi- plex Assay for Detection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 and Hepatitis C Virus RNA [ J]. Journal of Clinical Microbiolo- gy. July 2002, 40(7) : 2408-2419.
  • 8丁士磊,杨怀德,何秀莲,李卫东.流感病毒胰酶不依赖性的研究[J].云南大学学报(自然科学版),2008,30(4):428-432. 被引量:3
  • 9赵斌秀,李炎,何维英,高荣梅,沈瑾,李新武.流感病毒对两种细胞敏感性的比较[J].中国消毒学杂志,2008,25(5):463-465. 被引量:17
  • 10雷达,艾立新,邓红樱,丁国允.流感大流行特征启示甲型H1N1流感防控策略[J].中国国境卫生检疫杂志,2009,32(3):145-150. 被引量:13

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部