期刊文献+

评桑德尔的分配正义观 被引量:2

A Review of Sandel's Conception of Distributive Justice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在分配正义的问题上,西方社会存在三种基本的观点,即功利主义、自由主义和社群主义。正如以罗尔斯为代表的当代自由主义是在批判功利主义的基础上形成的,桑德尔的社群主义分配正义观念也建立在批评罗尔斯式自由主义的基础上:一方面,他批判罗尔斯的分配正义理论,反驳了罗尔斯对平等主义和差别原则的论证;另一方面,他主张以应得为原则的分配正义观,用社群主义来对抗自由主义。 About the question of distributive Justice, there are three fundamental standpoints in Western society, that is, utilitarianism, liberalism and communitarianism. Just as John Rawls's liberalism is built on his critique of utilitarianism, Michael Sandel's communitarian conception of distributive justice is built on the critique of Rawls's liberalism: On the one hand, Sandel criticizes Rawls's theory of distributive Justice, and rebuts his justification of egalitarianism and difference principle; On the other hand, he holds that the desert should be the principle of distributive Justice, and he takes it against liberalism.
作者 姚大志
出处 《社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第10期98-105,共8页 Journal of Social Sciences
基金 教育部重点研究基地重大项目"分配正义研究"(项目批准号:12JJD710011)的阶段性成果
关键词 桑德尔 社群主义 分配正义 自由主义 Sandel Communitarianism Distributive Justice Liberalism
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Michael Sandel, Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2009, p. 19, pp. 3-d, pp. 6-8, p. 9.
  • 2Michael Sandel, Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy, Cambridge, Mass: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1998, p. 329.
  • 3Michael Sandel, Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2009, pp. 266-267.
  • 4Michael Sandel, Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy, Cambridge, Mass: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1998, p. 333.
  • 5Michael Sandel, Liberalism and the Limit of Justice, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1982, p. 79, p. 96, pp. 96-97.
  • 6I Michael Sandel, Liberalism and the Limit of Justice, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1982, p. 97, pp. 101-103.
  • 7John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971, p. 523.
  • 8Michael Sandel, Liberalism and the Limit of Justice, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1982, p. 99.
  • 9Michael Sandel, Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2009, pp. 159-160.
  • 10Michael Sandel, Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2009, p. 179, pp. 186-188, pp. 160-164, 178-179, 187-188.

同被引文献25

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部