期刊文献+

心理距离对自发特质推理的影响 被引量:7

The Influence of Psychological Distance on Spontaneous Trait Inference
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用错误再认范式,考察了心理距离是否影响个体对他人行为的自发特质推理。实验1采用2(配对类型:图片-可推测的特质词、图片-不可推测的特质词)×2(空间距离:近、远)的混合设计,要求被试判断特质词是否在前面的行为句中出现过,以探讨自发特质推理形成情况。结果表明,与近空间距离相比,被试对远空间心理距离的行为主体产生了更多的自发特质推理。实验2采用2(配对类型:图片-可推测的特质词、图片-不可推测的特质词)×2(时间距离:近、远)的混合设计,被试反应与实验1相同。结果发现,与近时间心理距离相比,被试对远时间心理距离的行为主体产生了更多的自发特质推理。实验结果提示远心理距离比近心理距离更利于自发特质推理,并在解释水平理论的框架内对结果进行了讨论。 Does psychological distance affect perceivers' formation of spontaneous trait inferences (STI) from others' behaviors? On the basis of construal level theory (CLT) which posits that distant (vs. close) entities are represented more in terms of their abstract, glob- al, and decontextualized features, in this study we predicted that perceived distance would increase the perceivers' tendency to draw spontaneous trait inferences from behavioral information about actors. The present study adopted a false recognition paradigm to explore the impact of psychological distance on spontaneous trait inferences. Experiment 1 used 2 (pair type: photograph- relevant trait words, photograph- irrelevant trait words) x 2 (spatial distance: close, distant) mixed design. In the study phase, 69 participants viewed two kinds of spatial distance photographs of actors paired with one - sentence trait - implying behavioral statements about them. In the test phase, those participants saw the same photographs paired with trait words. Then they were asked to decide whether they had seen the trait words in the previous sentence about this person to ex- plore the formation of spontaneous trait inference. The results showed that perceivers formed more STIs about spatially distal actors vs. spatially proximal actors. Experiment 2 used 2 ( pair type : photograph - relevant trait words, photograph - irrelevant trait words) x 2 ( temporal distance : close, distant) mixed design with 67 participants. The experiment procedure was the same as Experiment 1 except for the distance ma- nipulation. The results showed that, compared with temporally proximal actors, perceivers formed more STIs about temporally distal ac- tors. In sum, distant psychological distance facilitates STI formation compared with proximal psychological distance. Results were dis- cussed within the framework of construal level theory.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期1031-1036,共6页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"内隐自我正面偏见的机制及可变性研究"(31171003) 湖南省教育厅科学研究重点项目(11A076)的资助
关键词 自发特质推理 解释水平理论 心理距离 spontaneous trait inference, construal level theory, psychological distant
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1阚忠玉.(2010).心理距离对道德判断的影响.西南大学硕士学位论文.
  • 2闫秀梅,王美芳.大学生自发特质推理的实验研究[J].心理学探新,2010,30(6):58-62. 被引量:2
  • 3张庆,闫秀梅,王美芳.大学生自发特质推理中的性别刻板效应[J].心理科学,2010,33(6):1488-1491. 被引量:3
  • 4钟毅平,陈文龙.心理距离对不道德行为判断的影响[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2012,11(2):96-99. 被引量:3
  • 5Bar- Anan, Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Gener- al, 30, 609 - 622.
  • 6Bargh, J.A. (Ed). (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Aware- ness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • 7Fiedler, K. , & Schenck, W. (2001). Spontaneous inferences from pic- torially presented behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulle- tin, 27, 533 - 546.
  • 8Lihennan, N., Sagristano, M. D., & Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimen- tal Social Psychology, 38(6), 523 534.
  • 9Liberman, N. , Trope, Y. , & Stephan, E. Jr. (2007). Psychological distance. Social Psychology: handbook of basic principles (2nd ed. ). New York: Guilford Press.
  • 10Newman, L. S. , & Uleman, J.S. (1990). Assimilation and contrast effects in spontaneous trait inference. Personality and Social Psychol- ogy Bulletin, 16, 224-240.

二级参考文献26

  • 1廖全明,黄希庭.自发特质推理研究的回顾与展望[J].西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,32(6):11-14. 被引量:11
  • 2Akrami, N., Ekeharnmar, B, & Araya, T. (2006). Category and stereotype activation revisited. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47, 513 - 522.
  • 3Dijksterhuis, A. & VanKnippenberg, A. (1996). The knife that cuts both ways: Facilitated and inhibited access to traits as a result of stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32 (3) :271 - 288.
  • 4Gross, E. F., & Hardin, C. D. (2007). Implicit and Explicit Stereotyping of Adolescents. Social Justice Research, 20, 140 - 160.
  • 5Rudman, L. A. , & Fairchild, K. ( 2004 ). Reactions to Counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2): 157- 176.
  • 6Stewart, T. L., Weeks, M., & Lupfer, M. B. (2003). Spontaneous stereotyping: A matter of prejudice? Social Cognition, 21, 263 - 298.
  • 7Uleman, J. S., Newman, L. S., & Muscovite, G. B. (1996). People as flexible imerpreters: Evidence and issues from spontaneous trait inference. Advances in experimental social psychology, 28 (3): 211-279.
  • 8Wigboldus, D. H. J., Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knippenberg, A. (2003). When stereotypes get in the way: Stereotypes obstruct stereotype inconsistent trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 284 : 470 - 484.
  • 9Wigboldus, D. H., Sherman, J. W., Franzese, H. L., & van Knippenberg, A. ( 2004 ). Capacity and comprehension: Spontaneous stereotyping under cognitive load. Social Cognition,22(3): 292 - 309.
  • 10Lieberman N.,Trope Y.The Role of Feasibility and De-sirability Considerations in Near and Distant Future De-cisions:a Test of Temporal Construal Theory[J].Journalof Personality and Social Psychology,1998,75(1):5-18.

共引文献5

同被引文献82

  • 1吕厚超,黄希庭.时间洞察力的心理结构、特征及研究焦点[J].心理科学,2004,27(5):1037-1040. 被引量:18
  • 2吕厚超,黄希庭.时间洞察力的概念及研究方法[J].心理科学,2005,28(1):166-169. 被引量:36
  • 3孙彦,李纾,殷晓莉.决策与推理的双系统——启发式系统和分析系统[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):721-726. 被引量:147
  • 4Trope Y, Liberman N. Construal level theory of psychological distance [ J]. Psychological Review, 2010, 117:440-463.
  • 5Liberman N, Trope Y. Traversing psychological distance [ J]. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2014, 18 : 364 - 369.
  • 6Aron A, Aron E N, Smollan D. Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness [ J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992, 63 (4) :596 - 612.
  • 7Macrae C N, Bodenbausen G V, Milne A B,et al. Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, 67:808 - 817.
  • 8Stephan E, Liberman N, Trope Y. The effects of time perspective and level of constrnal on social distance [ J ]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2011, 47 : 397 -402.
  • 9Wakslak C J. The where and when of likely and unlikely events [ J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2012, 117 : 150 - 157.
  • 10Fiedler K, Jung J, Wanke M, et al. On the relations between distinct aspects of psychological distance : An ecological basis of construal - level theory[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2012, 48 : 1014 - 1021.

引证文献7

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部